[ad_1]
President Donald Trump demanded a recount in Milwaukee County (Wisconsin) that cost his campaign $ 3 million. This recount ended with 132 more votes for his rival, President-elect Joe Biden. The theory about electoral fraud continues to collapse.
Asking for a recount of the votes in elections is possible. The laws, however, vary by state. In some of the states the campaign that demands a recount has to bear the costs of the recount. And that was precisely what Donald Trump did.
The president demanded a recount of the votes in Milwaukee County in Wisconsin, where his rival won an advantage of almost 200,000 votes in the elections. This count cost his campaign US $ 3 million, money that would have come from the collection made by the Republican president to challenge the results. But unfortunately for the Trumpistas, history did not favor them from the beginning. Counts do not change results.
Yes, the final result may vary after counting by a few tens or even hundreds of votes. But Trump needed a change in the tens of thousands. It was highly unlikely that this would occur. And now that the count is over, we can see that the trend continues. The recount added just 125 votes to Trump. But there is another negative result for the Republican: the new count added 257 to Biden. This means that the Democratic president-elect had a net gain of 132 votes.
This new defeat for Trump is also a defeat for his conspiratorial speech on an alleged electoral fraud. The president has insisted that the elections were stolen from him, and for this reason he filed lawsuits in several courts to reverse the results. But in the courts Trump and his legal team have taken a beating. Courts, even those where there is a conservative bias that may have favored Trump, have not upheld the president’s demands for lack of evidence.
Trump gives in little by little
The hectic and confusing transition process continues in the United States, after President Trump hinted for the first time this week that he will leave office if the electoral college votes for Democrat Joe Biden while reiterating that there was “fraud” in the elections last November 3.
“I certainly will, and you know it,” he said Thursday night to questions from reporters, after a call with troops deployed abroad on Thanksgiving Day, about whether he will leave the White House if Biden is voted into the electoral college.
It is the first time that the president acknowledged, albeit implicitly, his defeat in the elections.
However, on Friday, before going to his private golf club in Sterling, Virginia, he again insisted on his theory without evidence of electoral “fraud”.
Amid this unusual scenario, and almost a month after going to the polls, Americans stare in amazement at Trump’s surprising and often contradictory statements.
This Monday, the president gave the green light to the start of the transfer of power to Biden, after Emily Murphy, head of the Federal Services Administration (GSA, in its acronym in English), began the transition process by unlocking resources so that the Democrat’s team takes control of the federal bureaucracy.
And, at the same time, he cried out from his Twitter account, which adds the messages of the president a warning of lack of evidence, the denunciations of “cheating and theft” by the Democrats.
His team, led by former New York Mayor Rudy Giulinai, has only until December 8 to develop its legal strategy.
On that day all states should have resolved any dispute and the governor of each territory must send the certified results to Congress.
Trump has tried to frustrate the electoral bureaucracy because, once the count of each state is confirmed, they consign the delegates that correspond to them within the Electoral College system on December 14 and transmit the result to the president of the Senate and vice president, Mike Pence, January 6th.
Once confirmed that Biden exceeds 270 electoral votes, the president-elect will inaugurate his term in a ceremony in front of the Capitol on January 20.
We recommend: Can the vote count favor Trump?
Trump, a president with no agenda obsessed on Twitter with fraud
[ad_2]
