[ad_1]
In the video of almost 3 minutes, published on Facebook, there was evidence of the crude procedure by which the prosecutor scolds the police for having presented the street dweller with drugs, but without evidence that he was selling narcotics.
“Are you bringing me a prisoner for this? You are a street dweller. Don’t you think you are a drug user? Do you think you were selling? Do you have the money to show that was selling? ”, the prosecutor interrogates a policeman who is unable to say anything.
After a few seconds, the agent tells the prosecutor that residents of the area where the homeless man was captured told him that the subject was selling drugs and they found the substance (bazuco) in his possession.
However, the prosecutor ignores it, refuses to receive it and says no will sign to the agent a record of good treatment to legalize the capture of the street dweller.
During the video you can see how the prosecutor is reluctant with the police and says that the case will be handled by the CTI of the Prosecutor’s office.
Finally, he refuses to sign the chain of custody at the request of the policemen. The woman says that this is the work of a police judicial and not hers.
The video ends without showing what the case was like and if the street dweller captured with the drugs was formally prosecuted or not.
This is the video of the unusual episode:
This case remembered a similar one occurred in Medellin
The situation went viral on February 9 and occurred in the Immediate Reaction Unit (URI) in the center of Medellín.
In the images it is heard that a policeman approaches the prosecutor’s office to present the detainee for the crime of cell phone reception; that is, the man was carrying equipment reported as stolen.
However, in the video it is observed that the official is uncomfortable with the fact, as she argues that there is overcrowding and that the cells are full of captured to receive more people. Furthermore, it points out that this situation can turn the site into “a source of contagion”.
Despite the fact that the uniformed man supports the official who is fulfilling her duty to capture him and present him to the competent authority properly, she refuses to leave him detained, and even, Threatens the uniformed officer to certify copies (open an investigation) for not understanding the risk of the pandemic.
