Prosecutor for controversy over detainee in Medellín gives his version



[ad_1]

The prosecutor involved in a controversy in Medellín after a video went viral in which she is seen having a discussion with a police officer over a detainee gave her version of the events.

“In the fulfillment of my duties last Friday, in a shift from 2 to 10, I attended a law enforcement officer assigned to the Manrique Police Station, who made a query about leaving a detainee available for a cell phone reception. My expression was clear when I indicated that it made no sense to leave a person detained only for a cell phone “He explained in an audio that he sent to his colleagues at the URI and that circulated through WhatsApp.

The official said that this is due to the number of detainees in the URI facilities, “and the high risk it implied in terms of contagion from this pandemic situation,” he noted.

She stated that, however, his explanation was not enough for the uniformed man.

“I was unaware that this policeman was filming me, I don’t know if he did it with the equipment camera or his cell phone. It has managed to generate a great impact on social networks, but an impact of a harmful nature; my image and my name have been defaced in the most dishonorable way”, He expressed.

The prosecutor described what happened as a “Scoundrel.”

“It hurts a lot that they attack your dignity. In terms of conscience I know that on Friday I acted as I had to act and that only an unscrupulous person was only looking to hurt me, “he added.

Finally, it indicated that it initiated the pertinent legal actions by formulating the respective complaint and presenting the complaint for the facts before the command of the Metropolitan Police.

“I will also file the same complaint with the Attorney General to request an investigation with preferential power,” he stressed.

Meanwhile, the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation indicated that a disciplinary investigation is underway, while the Metropolitan Police of Valle de Aburrá detailed in a statement that “regarding the specific case, it is pertinent to indicate that the procedure was received by the accusing entity and filed through criminal notice No. 050016000206202102228 ”.



[ad_2]