Luis Fernando Restrepo was speaking in Win Sports about the Dimayor protocol and television broadcasts and they interrupted him



[ad_1]

Although it may be a simple impression of the viewers, it was strange what happened in the program ‘Saque Largo’ on the afternoon of Wednesday, April 22. And while Luis Fernando Restrepo was speaking he was speaking in Win Sports about the Dimayor protocol and the soccer broadcasts, they ended up interrupting his objections and criticism.

In the space of the Colombian sports channel they had as a special guest the veteran journalist, who for many years has been a correspondent in Europe and currently works at Directv Sports. And despite the fact that the company Directv is a partner of RCN as co-owners of Win, the country gave one of its customary criticisms, that in international spaces they generate discussions, but they do not cut it.


Video: When ‘LuisFer’ Restrepo was talking on Win Sports about Dimayor’s protocol and TV broadcasts

Next we will quote the conversation that Restrepo was having with the members of the mentioned program; Eduardo Luis, Juan Felipe Cadavid, Steven Arce, Pablo Ríos and Julián Céspedes. At first he was referring to the document that soccer managers presented to the government, with the advice of a Canadian company:

– Restrepo: “What is the true certainty of the success of this protocol, if it has not even been tried anywhere in the world?

That is to say; Are they already sure that it will work? If it is so successful, why haven’t they put it in other countries? Why the sport in Canada has not started? I don’t know, I just leave that there. “

+ Eduardo: “No, let’s say ‘LuisFer’ that the protocol that Dimayor, in company with the Federation, drew up is based on the protocol of Germany, that of Italy.

That is, we will be fortunate that, while here on May 11 the mandatory quarantine is ending, in Germany on the 9th they would begin to apply it and we will have ‘the mirror’ of how it is done. Theoretically it is almost like taking a bit out of each protocol “

– Restrepo: “What you have to look at is that the rhythm of the pandemic on May 11 in Colombia is very different from what has happened in Germany, it is under control there. In Colombia it is not known if it will be able to resist later when it rises the curve (of COVID-19 infections). That’s what I mean “

+ Eduardo: “We will have to wait for that, without the government you cannot”

– Restrepo: “You don’t have to look at so many ‘mirrors’ in this because the pandemic is very changeable”

> Cadavid: “The delivery of the protocol does not mean ‘this is’ and ‘so we go’ and ‘on such a date’. The delivery of the protocol is a first idea, which the government looks at and will make recommendations to Dimayor. And it will have modifications and will change to the rhythm of the pandemic and seeing what happens in Europe “

* Maple: “Yesterday I read a publication of the Diario As, written by Mirko Calemme, who is there in Italy, a very good journalist. And he said that any protocol in Europe that is going to be considered and the measures that are taken, are valid and can be done very well written on the paper.

But the most important thing is that there will be evidence of COVID-19, that is the basis of any protocol that is required in Europe “

– Restrepo: “Sure, that is the basis, but even with the drawback that the same tests are not being done in all countries.

Why is Germany more advanced? Because in Germany, at the beginning of the virus, many people were sent to subway train stations, to public places, to take everyone’s temperature. And whoever had a fever was being isolated, even if it was asymptomatic.

They ‘stung’, but neither Italy nor Spain nor England or the United Kingdom. Here, just 18,000 tests are being done, when the government promised 100,000, that is, we are 82,000 below the minimum.

This is not even for all countries and does not mean that they are resources

Another thing that the epidemiologists I am talking about are saying, because I am not, is that these tests have their margin of error, they are not 100% accurate and there are some that are up to 80% valid “

But apart from the fact that Luis Fernando Restrepo was speaking in Win Sports about the Dimayor protocol, he also referred to the soccer broadcasts and the urgency he sees in returning to play without improving many things. It was at that time that they cut it, because it obviously seemed like a criticism of the same channel:

– Restrepo: “Why rather not be thinking about how we can readjust soccer to television? Or how to start making better soccer television shows? How to put ‘Go Pro’ cameras on the players? How to connect between Players? Listen in the houses what they speak. How to see the VAR communications? A new graphic package as was done with Formula 1.

Instead of looking for dates, here, there, there. What he is doing is getting people into anxiety and they are even losing interest and there is a very big uncertainty.

And it is not healthy, mentally, to be involved in the uncertainty of When will we leave the house? When will we go to soccer? When will we go to the supermarket? Or when will we go back to a concert?

That affects mental health more, I think … (INTERRUPTION) “

+ Eduardo: “‘Pablito’. What a shame ‘LuisFer’, but ‘Pablito’ is asking to speak.

To close now, because we have another guest “


And so was the cut, what is striking is that there was not a single guest more in the other half hour of the program. So there was a feeling that when Restrepo was talking on Win Sports about Dimayor’s protocol and soccer broadcasts on TV, they stopped him.

>> More news on Colombian football at ComuTricolor <<



[ad_2]