Luigi Echeverri retracts due to false accusations against Iván Cepeda



[ad_1]

After the congressman presented a tutelage that was ruled in his favor, the official had no choice but to retract.

This Monday, in a short note published by the newspaper El País itself, Echeverri said that he retracted what Cepeda said on September 5, 2020, clarifying that incurred “an error when broadcasting a message whose content was not verified, since the statements were harmful to their rights to good name, honor and freedom of expression ”.

In an interview with Caracol Radio, Cepeda called the note “concise” and “laconic”, especially when comparing it with the “long and detailed expletive” text that gave rise to the altercation. However, he said “It is the fulfillment of a sentence”, so he valued the fact.

Echeverri’s letter even surprised Javier Moreno, the director of the Spanish medium to which it was addressed. According to him, record the fact produced “laughter and indignation”, and described the letter as “extravagant”, adding that it is something that “does not usually happen.”

The presidential counselor reproached the Spanish newspaper for to have given the devil a pulpit [Cepeda] to officiate the liturgy of organized crime; to the morbid gospel of the political ideology that validates the forces of global narco-terrorism, which like the wolf disguised as a grandmother proclaims the democratic statements with which they cover up the narco-communist radicalization that has been turning the illegal into legal, under the graphic flattery of the dove that symbolizes the ideal of peace ”.

Cepeda commented that also he was surprised by the “biblical and theological” language with which he was pointed out, and commented that he is already used to winning these tutelage, remembering that he even won one for Echeverri’s father.

In addition, he added that former senator Álvaro Uribe also used them, whom he accused of “use your investment [cuando era jefe de Estado] to make these claims“.

“This episode has been concluded,” concluded the parliamentarian when speaking with the station, underlining that freedom of expression must be respected, but also honor and good name.



[ad_2]