[ad_1]
In the last hours, a new statement from alias ‘Jesús Santrich’ was released, dated October 24, which was published on the Twitter account A Contracorriente PC3.
‘Santrich’ reappeared to provide details of the assassination of conservative leader Álvaro Gómez Hurtado, and the way in which Rodrigo Londoño, alias ‘Timochenko’, has decided to criticize the actions of those who have decided to remain in arms.
“Regarding those who publish lying and confusing messages, it is not true that the execution of Álvaro Gómez Hurtado was ordered by ‘Mono Jojoy’ and that ‘he notified the FARC Secretariat once the murder was committed’, and that a few days later, Manuel Marulanda directed all of us to remain silent, ”the statement said.
It may interest you: Duque asks the Ministry of Defense to lead the attack against Feliciano Valencia
It is worth remembering that the members of the FARC political party who remain in the law recognized the participation of the ex-guerrilla in that murder and in other homicides committed between 1987 and 2002.
‘Santrich’ also affirms that the murder of Gómez Hurtado was decided in a conference and “keeping it secret was also a collective determination, of direction, for which the FARC respond as an organization that acted against one of the top representatives of the terror regime. that still reigns in Colombia ”.
On the other hand, in the statement, ‘Santrich’ tells alias ‘Timochenko’ that the difficult moments that the Farc party goes through are not the result of any stalking of those who were his comrades in arms, “you are the main responsible and who really serves the oligarchy on a silver platter and on his knees, and what he serves is the caviar of surrender ”.
Timochenko distancing
In the statement, which was released yesterday, they also talk about his distancing from ‘Timochenko’ by stating that both he and the one they call ‘Timochenko’ are “a true fiasco that is ashamed and regrettable, and therefore it was not born to do Another assessment and feelings were not even fed to refute them or to confront them in their present of failures or in their future, distanced from the revolutionary vision in which we previously agreed ”.
He assures that although in official documents of the Farc Party, and from other political parties and sectors, it is considered that his decision to return to arms “is an adventure and irresponsibility”, according to ‘Santrich’ they will not “discuss that at shots”.
And later he adds that “to Timochenko, nobody in the Farc-EP Segunda Marquetalia has wanted or wants to kill him.”
[ad_2]
