[ad_1]
The presenter went against Rueda in the middle of a CDF channel debate, where he showed his disagreement with the proposals of the Valle del Cauca strategist.
“There is a fundamental thing and it is the philosophy with which it faces the parties, giving up attacking in the last minutes seeing the result, “he said initially.
De Tezanos thus referred to Chile would have preferred to defend 2-1 for which he was winning and that for that reason he ended up losing the victory, because Falcao García tied in favor of Colombia in addition time.
And he added that there may be some cowardice in the instructions of Reinaldo Rueda with his supposed orders to send his footballers to the rear:
“Before, with other coaches, Chile did not give up the attack, leaving a striker and putting up 9 defenders. We ended up playing like the Knockout was played 30 years ago. It’s like going back ”.
In addition, he highlighted that Colombia selection put a lot of strikers at the top of the match, even sacrificing the containment zone, since the last change was the inclusion of Falcao instead of Wilmar Barrios’ midfielder.
“Chile played against a rival who gave up the central midfielder and to whom 3 right backs were injured ”, he reflected.
But not everything was ‘stick’ for the ‘coffee’ coach, as another of the panelists of the opinion space preferred to charge inks against the footballers who face the Play off: “We were playing against a Colombian team that was taking over and for me there is more responsibility for the midfield than for Reinaldo Rueda himself ”.
In video, De Tezanos’ attack on Reinaldo Rueda after Chile and Colombia’s 2-2:
Manuel De Tezanos: “We ended up playing the way they played in the qualifiers 30 years ago” #AllTechnicalSounds #ClassificatoryxCDF 👇 pic.twitter.com/ovQZCYfZbo
– CDF (@CDF_cl) October 14, 2020
[ad_2]
