[ad_1]
This is what several analyzes have been raising that see in the conflicts between Law 600, by which the Supreme Court of Justice decided the case, and Law 906, or accusatory criminal system, by which the case was received by the Attorney General’s Office of the Nation, the main knot that ties Álvaro Uribe to his El Ubérrimo farm in Córdoba.
The defense team of the former president, led by lawyers Jaime Granados and Jaime Lombana, felt the first rigors of the situation last Wednesday, when Judge 30 of the Control of Guarantees of Bogotá postponed the procedure to define the freedom of the leader of the Democratic Center.
For many, that same day former President Uribe would be released; after the decision of the togada, many others thought (and still think) that the subject will only take a few days. However, there are less optimistic accounts that begin to speak of weeks.
“This could take up to a month”, Said, emphatically, Darcy Quinn, from Caracol Radio, referring to the subject, and explained his reasons:“ In the first week, it will hardly be possible to define what procedure to take [Ley 600 o Ley 906], and against that procedural decision, remedies for reconsideration and appeal are pertinent ”.
And this, for the journalist, although it does not suspend the hearing, “it would lengthen the terms a little more [plazos]”.
Later, he raised another consideration, which has to do with the study itself of Uribe’s request for freedom raised by his lawyers. “In that petition, other issues will enter: that the model of the accusatory criminal system be applied, and they will try to invalidate the tests performed”.
“Then comes the debate on how the two processes are harmonized: the inquisitorial and the accusatory,” Quinn added. And there is also the substantive debate: whether or not Uribe knew of Diego Cadena’s crimes, whether or not he represents a danger to the process while he is free”.
And in conclusion, he issued his concept: “For many, here we can stay several weeks in the hearing of former president Uribe”.
Semana magazine considers that “the safest thing, and what corresponds”, is that Judge 30 of Control of Guarantees “conclude that the case should continue in the accusatory criminal system”. But, if this publication is right, the situation becomes more complex because “as it opened a formal debate in audience, whoever is dissatisfied with their decision may appeal it”.
“It is not clear if the case is frozen or can continue while a second instance is pronounced”, adds this media, and cites “some criminal lawyers” who consider that “the problem would have no precedent, and, therefore, the Supreme Court would have the last word “, which”It would take several weeks for Uribe’s defense to present its arguments to demand his freedom”.
[ad_2]
