[ad_1]
In a video that he published on Instagram, the daughter of the fugitive former congresswoman Aída Merlano went at the ready against whom he made public some images for which he received messages in which they asked him if she was the one who appeared in the material that went viral.
Excerpts from the video that Aída Victoria Merlano recorded to explain if she was indeed the one that appeared in the sexual recording were published by Caracol Radio to give way to the opinions of the journalists of that station.
“There is a violation of their privacy and those who really should be at this time in the public arena were the ones who published and shared that video, especially the couple with whom [ella] recorded it, ”reproached Darcy Quinn. “In the privacy of all of us, we are supposed to rule. This is a crime, typified, in addition. Pursued by the Prosecutor’s Office ”.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
“Yes, and she ends up paying the duck and not the one who puts the video in circulation,” added the director of the news program ‘6 AM Hoy por hoy’, Gustavo Gómez.
With his brief comment, he gave way to Mábel Lara, who also expressed his opinion: “All the reason. What she does with her private and sexual life is inconsequential for the country. However, what you are arguing is very true. Who should answer is who records the video because it violated a norm. If it were another scenario in which it was not Aída Victoria Merlano, the daughter of Aída Merlano, then she violated an agreement between the two, private, secret. ”
“He should answer,” added Lara bluntly. “And that double standard that we Colombians have, in addition, to end the dignity of women who appear supposedly in videos, and we began to rotate, to rotate with that morbidness. This time, she is absolutely right about what her sexuality and her relationships mean. “
The lawyer Hernando Herrera also participated in the conversation, although with a very realistic nuance. “Absolutely reprehensible. I agree with what Darcy and Mábel have pointed out. A woman and a man have every right in the privacy to trust and additionally not to betray them. And that typifies irregular conduct ”.
“But we must not forget that Mrs. Aída Victoria Merlano has several facets. This is one. And this is your privacy. But the other facet is precisely that which has to do with his eventual collaboration in his mother’s escape. That is a fact that I would like to highlight, because these events sometimes erase the other, and the other was extremely serious, “added Herrera.
However, Gómez pointed out: “But one thing is one thing and another thing is another thing.”
“Of course,” admitted Herrera: “One thing is the solidarity that is generated by the fact of the irregular distribution of this video and another thing is the eventual responsibility that she may have in her mother’s flight.”
However, there is a doubt about whether the journalists saw the entire video of Aída Victoria Merlano, since they assume that it is hers and that her partner was the one who viralized it.
The young woman clarifies at minute 5:28 of her video (from 6:34) that it is not her. “Finally and here is the answer, which is what they came to: no, I am not the one in the video. And in my life there would have been no difference if it had been me, ”he said.
He also said that behind that video “there is a person who is having a really bad time,” with whom she says she communicated by phone. “He has a family that is suffering, and suffering a lot […], that he is having to suffer the consequences of an act that was not harming anyone and that, apart from that, is old ”.
However, they are all right: she and the journalists who support them, in this case.
[ad_2]
