[ad_1]
#SpoilerAlert. If you have not seen the fourth season of the series, we recommend not reading this article.
The fourth season of “The crown”, One of Netflix’s most prestigious series, the British royal family did not like it at all. The relationship between Prince carlos Y Diana of Wales it aspired to become one of the most controversial subjects of the new chapters and it has lived up to the expectations, as it has caused a great indignation in the House of Windsor. (File: Diana, a fairy tale with a tragic ending).
Especially upset is the heir to the Crown, outraged not only with the general tone with which the series presents his figure and his relationship with Lady Di, but especially with two scenes from the Peter Morgan series.
Although Buckingham have always wanted to stay out of the representation of the royal family in the Netflix series, this silence has been broken with the arrival of one of the thorniest issues for the Windsors: Lady Di. (You may be interested: “The Crown”: the Lady Di style played by Emma Corrin).
Close friends of Carlos de Inglaterra have denounced that the fourth season shows a “wrong” portrait of the failed relationship between the heir and the young Spencer.
“There is no intention to tell a carefully nuanced story, everything is very two-dimensionalSources close to the prince commented, according to the Daily Mail.
“The public should not be misled into thinking that this is an accurate account of what actually happened.“Added these sources who lament the series’ lack of sensitivity when addressing painful events that have not yet healed. (You can also read: The Crown will include warnings about bulimia in season 4).
The heir, who turned 72 this past Saturday, November 14, is very unhappy with the representation that the series starring Olivia Colman makes of him and his marriage. Among the passages that have particularly bothered the prince are some in which he verbally assaults his wife or in which Diana confronts the Queen and Charles in St. Paul’s Cathedral. Another aspect that has disappointed him is that the series suggests that the idyll between Carlos Y Camila Parker Bowles continued during his courtship with Diana and subsequent wedding.
But there have been two specific scenes that, according to the British media, have especially outraged the Prince of Wales. The first is related to the death of Lord Mountbatten (Charles Dance). In fiction, the count sends him a letter shortly before he died in an attack carried out by the IRA. In this epistle, Mountbatten communicates to Carlos his disappointment at continuing to have an affair with Camila Parker Bowles (Emerald Fennell) and not fulfilling his duty to find a wife.
In that same episode, in the last conversation between Felipe de Edimburgo’s uncle and the heir to the crown, Carlos (Josh O’Connor) reproached his favorite great-uncle for his behavior, calling him a “traitor”. What’s more, the chapter hints that it was the murder of the count that prompted the prince to settle down and look for an ‘ideal candidate’.
The truth is that there is no record of such friction between Lord Mountbatten and Charles of England in the days before the tragic death of the Earl, whom the Prince of Wales considered practically his grandfather.
There is also no evidence of the existence of a letter from Mountbatten reproaching Carlos for not having married yet, nor disapproving of his love affair with Camila. Although the dates coincide, it is not considered that Diana’s courtship was a consequence of Mountbatten’s death. All this would, therefore, be an artistic license for the series to make the story more attractive. Transgressions typical of all non-documentary fiction, but that have not done well in Buckingham.
The other scene that, according to the prince’s close circle commented to the Daily Mail, has greatly annoyed Charles is in which, in 1990, the Duke of Edinburgh (Tobias Menzies) seriously threatens Diana (Emma Corrin), when she stops talk to your husband.
This sequence has done “special damage” to Carlos, who considers the artistic license to be “insidious”, because there is no evidence whatsoever that it has occurred. In addition, her close circle believes that this fuels conspiracy theories related to the tragic death of Diana, who died in a car accident on August 31, 1997 in Paris while being chased by photographers.
“A ‘Downton Abbey’ version of the royal family”
On the other hand, Carlos has not been amused either that the series suggests that the idyll that existed between him and Camila continued during his engagement with Diana and subsequent wedding, as well as an alleged confrontation that took place between miss di and the Queen in the cathedral of San Pablo, something that, it seems, did not happen.
The controversy has also reached the biographers of the Royal House. Sally Beddel Smith, one of the family’s biographers, believes that “The crown“Is” a work of fiction and the level of invention has been growing with each season. “
“Although the previous installments were period pieces, the current one is recent history, which makes it more cruel when recreating it“He says, accusing Peter Morgan of being” very Trumpist with his alternative facts. ” “The public should not be fooled, this is a version of ‘Downton Abbey’ of the royal family,” he concludes.
[ad_2]
