This time the case is against Khaleda-Tareq-Fakhrul on the subject of sculpture.



[ad_1]

Khaleda Zia, Tareq Rahman and Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir (file photo)

Amid the ongoing sculpture controversy, a case has been brought against three top BNP leaders on the subject. The defendants in the case are BNP President Begum Khaleda Zia, her son, Acting Party Chairman Tarique Rahman and Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir. They have been accused of collaborating in anti-sculpture speeches.

Acting Amir Junaid Ahmed Babungari of Hefazat-e-Islam, Muhammad Mamunul Haque, Acting Secretary General of Bangladesh Khilafah Majlis, and Syed Faizul Karim of the Islamic regime, have also been charged in the case of making statements against the sculptures. .

The case was brought before the Dhaka Metropolitan Chief Magistrate Satyabrata Sikder’s court on Wednesday morning by AB Siddiqui, Chairman of Jannetri Parishad. The court said it would accept the plaintiff’s statement and issue an order later.

Hefazat-e-Islam Deputy Secretary General Mamunul Haque told a discussion meeting at the BMA Bhaban auditorium on Topkhana Road in the capital on November 13 this year that there would be no sculptures in Bangladesh and that sculptures would not be allowed. of the Father of the Nation. Junaid Ahmed Babungari, the current acting emir of Hifazat-e-Islam, said in Hathazari in Chittagong on November 26 that there would be no sculpture if the country left with the Medina Charter. He threatened the government that if construction of the sculpture was not stopped, another Shapla Chattar would be built. Speaking at a public meeting of the Islamic regime in front of the Baitul Mukarram National Mosque, Faizul Haque said: “If any sculpture is made in Bangladesh, all the sculptures will be broken and thrown into the Buriganga.”

Earlier, Begum Khaleda Zia had said at a Hefazat-e-Islam rally in Shapla Chattar led by Begum Khaleda Zia that he would shoot down Sheikh Hasina at 8am. You keep working that way. Hefazat-e-Islam militants set fire to the Baitul Mukarram National Mosque on Babungari’s order and burned the Holy Quran Sharif. Since independence, these extremist anti-independence activists have continued their misdeeds and are humiliating the country before the world by distorting the father of the nation, the map of the country, the national flag and the history of the liberation war.

It is alleged that the defeated groups Jamaat-e-Islami, Al-Badr, Razakars and war criminals were defeated in the 1971 war of independence. It has been creating chaos among the people of the country by carrying out propaganda to erase the history of misdeeds, chaos and independence and the memory of the father of the nation. This is creating a misunderstanding among the people of the country about the history of independence. Since then, anti-independence Pakistani intermediaries have been committing anti-national misdeeds in this country, one after another.

He also said that on August 21, 2004, BNP President Begum Khaleda Zia allied with the militants and killed 24 leaders and activists of the Awami League with a militant grenade attack along with her son Tareq Rahman to assassinate to Sheikh Hasina, the daughter of the father of the nation. Sheikh Hasina survived thanks to the infinite mercy of God. Also in 2014, under the leadership of Begum Khaleda Zia, Jamaat Shibir and BNP thugs killed thousands of innocent people with horrible gasoline bombs.

Faced with this situation, the Islamic militant group led by Begum Khaleda Zia broke the arm of the sculpture of the Father of the Nation in Kushtia on the night of December 4 with their thugs. Dhaka University broke a sweet sculpture ear.

So the plaintiff thinks that this country was born under the leadership of that father. An independent Bangladesh broke the hand of that father, BNP-Jamaat, Hifazat-e-Islam, Islamic Shams-e-Tantra, all these Islamic organizations that plan to create Pakistan undermining the sovereignty of the independence of this country and want to erase the name from the father of the nation. Therefore, in the interest of justice, by making the accused against the accused pursuant to articles 500/506/109 and 426 of the Penal Code, I request the issuance of an arrest warrant against the accused during the period of the crime.

(Dhaka Times / December 9 / JB)



[ad_2]