The main case of fraud in the history of the judiciary was detected



[ad_1]

Court

Despite taking legal action against those involved, the fraud in the higher court has not stopped. Various scammers illegally take advantage of the Superior Court by falsifying court documents. Ignoring the watchful eye of the court, day after day these cycles are corrupting the sanctity of the judiciary rather than tactics. However, the High Court has learned of one of the most shocking fraud in the history of the judiciary.

Abdus Sattar, who was sentenced to 18 years in prison for a weapons case, forged documents and escaped from High Court. The defendant was unable to get out of jail as bail was later canceled.

Abdus Sattar, son of Nizam Uddin from Kayetpara in Alamdanga upazila de Chuadanga, was arrested in 2016 with a pistol and ammunition. The court later sentenced Sattar, the only defendant in the case, to 18 years in prison. He then applied to the High Court for bail in the case from jail. The High Court granted Sattar bail after hearing the appeal.

However, despite the bail order, it later came to the notice of the court that bail had been requested by changing the weapons case statement, investigation report, seizure list, and verdict. In other words, all relevant court court documents have been amended. Furthermore, despite being the only defendant in the weapons case, Abdus Sattar appears as the second defendant in the forged documents. The number one defendant in the case was shown to a person named Abdus Salam. However, the cycle of counterfeits did not stop here. Although weapons (pistols) were recovered from Sattar in the case, the forged documents mentioned that a Chinese ax was recovered. Additionally, each witness statement in the case has been modified by the fraudsters who went to Superior Court to request bail.

Elegant documents that were later forged by Judge M. Inayetur Rahim and Justice. The double bank of the High Court comprising Mostafizur Rahman was noted. Later, the case was heard in court.

Attorney Sheikh Atiyar Rahman appeared for the defendants in court on Wednesday (September 30). On the other hand, the Deputy Attorney General was representing the state. Sarwar Hossain Bappi.

During the bail application hearing, the Superior Court said: ‘Who knows how many bail orders were obtained by falsifying bail documents? We may not be able to catch it all. But such a forgery of bail is taking place when making documents.

Addressing the bail statement of defendant Sattar’s lawyer, Sheikh Atiyar Rahman, the High Court said: ‘How did this bail fraud gang find out about you? You and your secretary, Sohail Rana, have been named in two other bond fraud cases. Do you have any responsibilities as a senior attorney? Did you get the case and stand up? Why did scammers attack you?

In response, lawyer Sheikh Atiyar Rahman said: “After I learned of the fraud, I sent my son and two assistants to the defendant’s area, brought the information, and presented it to the court.” I am ashamed to face such a situation in my later years! ‘

Later, Deputy Attorney General. Sarwar Hossain Bappi told the court: “Bail has been requested by changing the statement, the investigation report, the seizure list, the evidence and the verdict in this arms case.” I don’t know if there has been a major fraud in the judiciary! ‘

At the time, the court said: ‘All the documents have been created. There are a lot of scams like this, maybe we can’t detect it.

Later, lead attorney Shah Manjurul Haque told the court about Sattar’s attorney, Sheikh Atiyar Rahman, “He is an old man. He has given the names of three members of the fraud ring to the court. Accept the request and release it.

In response, the High Court expressed outrage, saying: “We have ordered action to be taken in the bail fraud case in seven and a half lakh yaba cases in Cox’s Bazar.” But what action has been taken, was not informed.

After hearing from both parties, the Superior Court ordered a case to be brought against five people accused of being involved in bail fraud. The superior court registrar was ordered to present a case. Those involved in the forgery are the defendants Abdus Sattar, two prison guards Biswajit alias Babu and Khairul, Nizamuddin, the father of the defendant who submitted the affidavit of bail and the lawyer in the case.

In addition, if the investigation proves the implication of the defendant’s lawyer, a legal action has also been initiated against him. At the same time, the High Court canceled the bail of the defendant Sattar.

Even before this, these types of bond fraud incidents have come to light many times in Superior Court. But in those cases of fraud, there have been cases of falsification of documents such as number, quantity of drug seized or change of name or sentence of the accused. But like Sattar, the Deputy Attorney General thinks that this is the biggest case of change of all court documents, that is, the case of forgery. Sarwar Hossain Bappi.

The leaders of the Supreme Court Bar Association are embarrassed by these frauds. Lawyer Ruhul Quddus Kajal, secretary of the association, told the Bengali Tribune: “I will not blame any lawyer without an investigation.” However, if evidence of an attorney’s involvement is found, action must be taken.

Shah Manjurul Haque, a senior Supreme Court attorney, said those involved in bail fraud should be brought to justice. “Such fraud is tarnishing the image of the judiciary,” he said.



[ad_2]