Corona – Who will win in the next world he loses?

The lost will be forever, but the calculation of the Corona-Norte world will be different. The people of Italy have shown the finger with their eyes. We have been taught to think, “Everything will be fine someday.” But will everything be fine later? In French President Emanuel Makho’s description, “The whole world is in the midst of the invisible. Given the political and economic consequences for the establishment of peace, urabarti would seem premature to answer this question. The British media have been trying to find answers. to this question in a report from The Guardian.

The Guardian analyst reports that world leaders, diplomats and geopolitical analysts know they are living in a time of renewal. They must be attentive to the daily struggle and the responsibility to tackle the world crisis. But in a world-class court, rival ideologies, powerful alliances, leaders, and systems of social solidarity must be tested under pressure. Meanwhile, everyone in this town has begun to take their own lessons. As Makhon predicted in France, “This time it will teach us a lot.” Many convictions will collapse and the conviction will vanish. Many things that would seem impossible will happen. The next day, when we win, the day before he will not return, we will be morally stronger. We can hit the consequences. ” He also promised to start with a large investment in the health sector.

A message of apprehension in the voice of Sigmar Gabriel from the former Social Democratic Party in Germany. He estimates that the next generation will be upset by globalization. Former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi has asked for a commission for the future. In Hong Kong, graffiti says, “You can’t go back to normal, because there was a problem in the first place.” Former United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger says rulers must be prepared to adapt to the coronavirus system. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said: “The relationship between the largest forces has never been more nil. Covid-1 shows dramatically, either we will be together or we will lose.”

However, no matter what the changing world is, the discussion of global thinkers is not about cooperation, but about who will emerge as a leader in the North or North America. In the UK, however, the debate is relatively low. There is currently no discussion on new policies in the UK. But the UK, tired of Brexit, seems unable to cope with the ups and downs.

There is more talk in Europe, America and Asia than in the United Kingdom about who will be powerful. It seems that even though public life is stagnant, the debate is rapidly spreading. There is no shortage of debates about the economy, public health, compensation, the relative merits of the central or regional health system, the fragility of globalization, the future of the European Union, the inherent benefits of authoritarianism.

The Guardian report says the coronavirus epidemic has become a global leadership competition. The countries that have been able to face this crisis more effectively will be a little ahead. Diplomats, embassies have been busy promoting the government’s ability to deal with the crisis and criticizing it as a crime.

International Crisis Group, based in Brussels, Belgium, has evaluated how the virus will permanently change international politics. According to that organization, in the current scenario, two are like learning. One is to work together to better defeat Covid-1. Another is to be more strictly separated to protect ourselves. The current situation will not only test the competence of the United Nations or the World Health Organization, but also the general problems of values ​​and political negotiations.

Many already claim that the “East” is ahead of the West in this battle of competitive detail. South Korean philosopher Byung-chul Han has argued that Asian regions like Japan, Korea, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan or Singapore could be called victorious. Because they have an authoritarian mindset, which comes from their Confucius culture. People are less rebellious and more obedient than those in Europe. They trust the state more. Daily life is much more organized. Asians are committed to taxing digital surveillance against the virus. Not only virologists and epidemiologists have fought in the Asian epidemic, but computer scientists and BigData experts have also fought.

As the Korean philosopher predicted, China will now be able to sell its concept of the “digital police” model as a successful model against the pandemic. China will proudly highlight the superiority of its system. That’s why Western voters are likely to give away a lot of their money.

The Guardian report also said that China has established itself as the world’s savior, not the culprit, of the virus, which has kept them a little ahead of the winner. The new generation of young Chinese diplomats has turned to social media to demand superiority from their country. But his propaganda is being criticized as ‘shameless’. Former French ambassador to the Monteignan Institute, Michelle Duclos, accused China of blatantly trying to spread political propaganda to win the virus.

Harvard international relations specialist Stephen Walt believes China may be the winner. In Foreign Policy Magazine, he says, “Coronavirus will accelerate the shift in power and influence from west to east. South Korea and Singapore have responded better, and China has managed to correct its first mistakes. The government response in Europe and the United States is very skeptical and probably undermines the power of the western brand. ”

The Slovenian philosopher Slavos, however, fears an authoritarian transition. He predicts that in the West, under the mask of humanity, such measures can be seen as cruel survival with brutality and even empathy. By contrast, Shivshankar Menon, visiting professor at Ashoka University, India, says, “So far, experience shows that no authorization or austerity is good at preventing epidemics.” Rather, countries that have taken successful steps in the early stages, such as Korea and Taiwan and where there is democracy, have done well. ”

Expert Francis Fukuyama praised Germany and South Korea, saying: “The main dividing line of an effective response to the crisis is that the dictatorship cannot be maintained in the other.” The capacity of the state to be more decisive than the type of government of the country and, above all, to trust the government.

South Korea is promoted as a democratic force compared to China. The national media is flooded with publicity about how its model is followed in Germany. Professor Joseph Stiglitz said: “South Korea has been a problem for a long time even though it is an export-oriented country.” He argued that the epidemic revealed the drawbacks of the production of medical equipment. South Korea may receive praise in some cases, but the market is actually losing. ‘

[ad_2]