BGMEA questions about TIB research criteria



[ad_1]

In a written response on Sunday, the organization’s president, Rubana Haque, said that Transparency International Bangladesh’s (TIB) report from December 16 titled “The coronavirus crisis in garment manufacturing challenges and actions of good governance “was claimed as an investigative report. It does not appear to have been done. Rather, through this report, TIB has tarnished its own image and questioned its acceptability.

“Such a negative attitude towards the industry does not bode well. It is necessary to investigate if there is any forecast behind all these activities ”.

TIB’s 26-page investigation report on the garment sector highlights several irregularities, including layoffs, low wages and unplanned factory operations during the epidemic.

BGMEA’s response, claiming that the researchers were biased in selecting data and data sources in qualitative research, did not re-evaluate the sources from which the data were collected directly and indirectly, but rather how complete, up-to-date, accurate and unbiased were the data obtained from these sources. There is ample room for questioning.

Landlords Take Advantage of Labor Laws in Epidemics: TIB

“The impressions are obtained in a fluid, global, diffuse way, where words such as ‘almost’, ‘most’, ‘in many cases’, ‘in some cases’ are used, which are not measurable and give a misleading idea of ​​the importance of the topic. In the case of serious allegations such as layoffs, layoffs, non-payment of wages, failure to follow health care guidelines, etc., vague and half-assed allegations and defamation violate investigation etiquette. “

The BGMEA complained that the study cited some media reports and many reports were omitted.

The BGMEA also criticized TIB’s allegations regarding layoffs, salaries and allowances, incentive rates and amounts, negligence in the disbursement of EU and German funds, and transparency.



[ad_2]