[ad_1]
What would have happened if Ziaur Rahman had not entered politics on November 7 or had not been assassinated? Perhaps the Hassad had taken over. What could be the situation in the country? This issue must also be taken into account.
Analyzing the history, activities and political programs of the JSD, it can be inferred that there was a possibility of reintroducing the one-party regime when the JSD came to power. The proposal to abolish the army and introduce a people’s army was demanded by the revolutionary army. There were fears of a political conflict. The Awami League is accused of killing large numbers of JSD leaders and activists. Hassad has also publicly killed the leaders of the Awami League. For these reasons, when Hassad came to power, there was fear of great conflict.
Hassad had attracted the youth at that time with a revolutionary spirit. But with the exception of the army and a small section of the student body, the political base of the Jats was not very strong. The Jass had interesting political and economic programs. But the Jass did not have the leadership or the manpower to implement these programs. Then there was no clear outline of Hassadiya socialism.
Thus, the JSS had no choice but to go to Zia’s side in a backlash against the Khaled Musharraf coup on November 3. On the contrary, by capitalizing on the popularity of Ziaur Rahman, the Hassad went on to carry out a revolution and wreaked havoc. For this reason, naturally, Ziaur Rahman consolidated his power. However, many people associated with the JSD at the time think that the JSD alone did not free Ziaur Rahman from captivity. At that time, those who kept Ziaur Rahman under house arrest ensured the safety of Ziaur Rahman. A large part of the army played an important role in the liberation of Ziaur Rahman. For all these reasons, Ziaur Rahman’s fear of death was less. Neither Khaled Musharraf nor the Jats could have killed or pressured Ziaur Rahman to avoid this large section of the army.
Ziaur Rahman must have had a good idea about his own popularity and status. Then he took control of everything and began to rule the country. Ziaur Rahman was not above controversy when ruling the country. During his time, many members of the armed forces, including Colonel Taher, were executed. Jass leaders and workers faced repression.
However, he put aside rivalries and political rivalries and brought the country out of the state of uncertainty and chaos. Although he was strict with his opponents, he was successful and popular as a pragmatic ruler. Originally, under the leadership of Ziaur Rahman, a new era began in the country in the political and economic field. On November 7, Ziaur Rahman had that opportunity. Ziaur Rahman made the most of this opportunity. This is the direct effect of November 7 on the political history of the country.
Dr. Maruf Mallick Political analyst
