Elections in the United States: Is it possible to reach a judicial agreement?



[ad_1]


US President Donald Trump approached the court about the election. But can the court intervene? There are many questions.

This is the biggest fraud in the history of the American elections. This is how the president of the United States, Donald Trump, explained the 2020 presidential elections on Wednesday. He has also addressed the courts to demand that the counting of votes in the three states be stopped. But in this way, the court can interfere in the American elections? Can the court make a decision on this? Not just in America, but around the world.

A large part of American legal experts say that the court cannot intervene in this way. The courts can intervene and direct certain matters in the presidential election. As it happened in 2000. Republican candidates George W. Bush and Democrat Al Gore ran for election that year. That year, the United States Supreme Court responded to Bush’s request for a recount of votes and ordered a recount.

According to some experts, Bush’s claims that year were clear and definitive. The circumstances in which the request for a recount was made also had a definite basis. Experts say Trump’s appeal is baseless. The way you oppose voting by mail has no legal basis. Trump’s allegations in court over Michigan, Pennsylvania, are unclear. As a result, there are considerable doubts as to whether the court will ultimately intervene.

Each state in the United States has its own laws. There are certain rules regarding postal ballots. Most experts believe that postal scrutiny is counted according to this rule. In fact, that’s why it’s taking so long to count votes this year. This time a record number of mail-in votes was cast thanks to Corona.

“The Supreme Court can look at two things,” Ned Foley, a US voting and law expert, told the Associated Press. The legitimacy of a vote and the question of whether two are making significant changes to the result. The court can only intervene if these two issues are confirmed.

He believes that Trump’s appeal does not address these two issues.

Of course, there are top legal experts with Trump. As a result, there is no reason to think that Trump’s appeal is completely unfounded. Trump has made it clear that the problem will escalate further. Joe Biden’s attorneys have also started drafting documents.

According to some political analysts, Trump has a huge advantage on the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court College has six Republican-era justices and three Democratic-era justices. Trump has been thinking about this issue for a long time, so in the run-up to the election, he first nominated the Chief Justice and then one more judge. There was a debate about that. Many also feel that Trump could gain some advantage, as Republicans are more assertive on the Supreme Court. Source: Deutsche Welle



[ad_2]