[ad_1]
A High Court court of Judge Naima Haider and Judge Rajik Al Jalil approved the order.
On Sunday, the court ruled that the three appeals filed by the 39 officers, who were denied promotions on various occasions between 2001 and 2003, were appropriate.
According to the ruling, the retired Co-Secretaries and Assistant Secretaries will obtain promotions and other benefits and promotions according to the availability of Assistant Secretaries, Co-Secretaries, additional Secretaries and Secretaries in 1996. According to the decision of the Appeals Division, the ‘Rules for promotion / appointment for the positions of Undersecretary, Co-Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary ‘of 2002 they will not be applicable or effective in the case of freedom fighters.
Lawyer Reza-e-Rabbi Khandaker appeared by rule in court. Assistant Attorney General Amit Talukder represented the state.
Reza-e-Rabbi told bdnews24.com: “These 39 freedom fighters are written petitioners. They were appointed by Bangabandhu. The government issued a policy in 1997 for its promotion. Then, in 1999, the government made a list of promotions based on seniority. Some of them were later promoted. Some of them have been promoted to assistant secretaries in light of the 1997 policy.
“But in 2002, the rules were formulated with new standards. This standard was established to exclude freedom fighters. Another case related to this went to the Appeals Division in 2011. In that case, the Appeals Division ruled that The 2002 rules would not apply to freedom fighters. And according to the 2002 rules, those who have been deprived of promotion have been given promotions, as of the promotion date of those juniors, the that have been deprived will obtain ghostly promotions according to their availability ”.
If the promotion had not been denied, of these 39, 36 would have been secretaries, one would be an additional secretary and another would be an assistant secretary, the lawyer said.
After formulating the promotion / appointment policy for the positions of Assistant Secretary, Co-Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary in 2002, the government of the quadripartite alliance violated seniority and deprived 12 Assistant Secretaries and 26 Co-Secretaries (all of them freedom fighters) of ascent.
After being deprived of the promotion, the Co-Secretary defied the 2002 rules. Saifuzzaman, Md. Amirul Islam and Deputy Secretary. Khalilur Rahman filed three writ petitions in 2013.
The brief challenged the 2002 ‘Promotion / Appointment Regulations for Undersecretary, Deputy, Additional Secretary, and Secretary’ positions.
The court issued a ruling on November 12, 2013 on the preliminary hearing.
The rule seeks to know why the rules formulated in 2002 are invalid in the case of the petitioners in writing and should not be declared in conflict with articles 26 and 29 of the Constitution and why 39 retired freedom fighters deprived of promotion should not be promoted under the 1996 policy.
The court ruled that the rule was appropriate.
[ad_2]
