Venediktova on the cases against Poroshenko: why she signed the suspicion



[ad_1]

Attorney General Irina Venediktova commented on the criminal proceedings against the fifth president and the current people’s deputy Petro Poroshenko. According to her, this is not a political persecution.

Details of Venediktova’s statement on the cases against Poroshenko

As the head of the Attorney General’s Office pointed out, President Zelensky is perhaps the first president who does not open cases against his enemies, does not close against friends and does not falsify. Venediktova made such a statement on the air of the program. “VIP with Natalia Moseichuk” .

To the topic The Rotterdam + case: who continues to block the investigation of the conspiracy between Akhmetov and Poroshenko

It seems to me that Mr. Poroshenko understands that he is just like other gentlemen. And here we definitely don’t talk about political persecution. Since many cases were opened directly by court decision,
– emphasized the Attorney General.

According to her, the Attorney General’s Office will see how these cases will be investigated. After all, various bodies are involved in Poroshenko’s affairs – “and the RRB is investigating, and NABU is investigating.”

Venediktova also answered the question whether the Poroshenko case would turn out to be a political soap bubble bursting.

“It seems to me that the issue of soap bubbles has disappeared. Those things are criminalized.” If I had not considered it possible to sign this suspicion, I would not have signed it. But I also have professional compensation … Let’s remember when we learned about the Biden-Poroshenko tapes, “said the Attorney General.

Interesting Where Poroshenko, Tymoshenko and others live: journalists showed the luxurious palaces of Kozin – video

Cases against Poroshenko: what is known

The SBU recently opened 15 new criminal proceedings.

From what Poroshenko is suspected

  • Violation of territorial integrity.
  • Overthrow of the constitutional order.
  • The seizure of state power.
  • Treason.
  • Conveyance.
  • Financing of terrorism.
  • Interference in the work of electronic computers and computer networks.

Prior to this, the CRR had investigated at least 15 cases. Most of the requests were submitted by one of the leaders of the fugitive’s administration. President Yanukovych – Andrey Portnov.

What does it matter are they talking about

  • The case of the passage of Ukrainian ships through the Kerch Straitwhat led to the Russian aggression against Ukraine; the introduction of martial law in Ukraine for a possible usurpation of power.
  • Seizure of state power and falsification of official documents by submitting a proposal for the appointment of the prime minister in the absence of a coalition in parliament.
  • Probable loss from the situational room of the Presidential Administration of carriers of classified information material containing state secrets.
  • Illegal crossing of the state border of Ukraine knowingly using forged documents (travel to the Maldives).
  • Illegal detention of Mikheil Saakashvili and his subsequent illegal expulsion from Ukraine.
  • Organization of the illegal transport of Nikolai Chaus across the state border to Moldova.
  • Cancel decision the chairman of the state administration of the Pervomaisky district of the Nikolaev region on the inscription of a plot of land within the territory of the Lenin village council to the lands of the state-owned reserve.
  • Tax evasion and the subsequent legalization (laundering) of the proceeds of crime during the sale of Zavod Kuznya na Rybalskiy to PJSC.
  • Tax evasion and the subsequent legalization (laundering) of the proceeds of crime during the LLC TV Channel Pryamoy sale transaction.
  • Illegal seizure owned by the recreation center “Ivashka” of the Ukrainian Society of the Blind by officials of LLC “Soyuz-Invest”.
  • Inappropriate influence hold a contest for the selection of candidates for the appointment of members of the Superior Council of Justice in March – May 2019; conducting a contest in a short time and staging, probably, illegal decisions to modify the procedure for conducting a contest.
  • Professional negligence and interference in the activities of judges due to their untimely appointment, which led to serious consequences in the form of unfounded payment of money from the state budget to pay their salaries.
  • Interference in the activities of the judges From the Kiev District Administrative Court by the President, members of the National Defense and Security Council regarding the decision to cancel the nationalization of Privatbank.
  • Possible betrayal through the Minsk agreements. Poroshenko allegedly reached an agreement to restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine “with representatives of the occupied territories of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions”, realizing that Russia is part of the conflict.

In addition, Poroshenko’s name appears in cases related to:

  • the circumstances of the legality of the theft of information during international negotiations,
  • illegal movement of 43 paintings across the border,
  • possible illegal wiretapping of his conversations with former US Vice President Joseph Biden.

According to the lawyers, in general, against Petro Poroshenko, the law enforcement officers opened 58 criminal proceedings.

By the way Poroshenko ignores quarantine under Seychelles flags: interesting facts


Poroshenko business

Details of the cases against Poroshenko / Infographic 24 channel

[ad_2]