[ad_1]
We are talking about Venediktova’s decision to change the group of prosecutors in the Tatarov case on December 1, just before the NABU detectives planned to inform her of the suspicion.
Maxim Grischuk
hromadske.ua
In connection with the fact that Attorney General Irenea Venediktovand at the beginning of December the group of prosecutors in the case changed about possible bribery of the deputy chapters Office of President Oleg Tatarov, NABU opened a criminal proceeding for interference in its activities. This was stated by Acting President of the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP) Maxim Grischuk in the air “HRoman“.
“On December 3, a procedure on interference in the work of law enforcement agencies was introduced in the ERDR” set Grischuk.
According to him, pIt is about Venediktova’s decision to change the group of prosecutors in the Tatarov case on December 1, just before NABU detectives planned to inform her of the suspicion.
According to Grischuk, when a prosecutor from the former group of prosecutors was already in court and had to request a containment measure for Tatarov, the SAP learned that the group of prosecutors had changed. Therefore, a new group of prosecutors was forced to reexamine the case and the suspicion was reported to the Deputy Chief of the Presidency on December 18.
Remember in On the night of December 24, the Attorney General’s Office transferred the case, in which Tatarov was found to be suspected of bribery, from the NABU to the Security Service of Ukraine.
Earlier, “Ukrainska Pravda”, citing its own sources, reported that on December 2, Tatarov should have been informed of the suspicion, but Venediktova blocked his delivery. At the same time, NABU detectives noted on record a decision to replace prosecutors.
The Attorney General also was presented to the group of prosecutorsleading the Tatarov case.
Recall that NABU and SAP investigated the fact of the possible participation of Tatarov in the falsification of the examination in the case of taking possession of the property of the National Guard, whose defendant is the former deputy of the Verkhovna Rada Maxim Mikitas.
In the fall of 2019, NABU and SAP informed Mikitas about the suspicion of organizing the seizure of more than 81 million UAH of state funds during the exchange of apartments for the National Guard army. According to the investigation, the former People’s deputy, using the construction companies controlled by him, acting by prior conspiracy with various officials, organized a corruption scheme to seize the property of the National Guard.
In December, NABU reported the suspicion to Tatarov. The investigation believes that an official, formerly a senior manager of the state-owned company UkrBud, may be involved in providing an illegal profit to ensure the issuance of an inaccurate written opinion of a forensic expert in the case of the seizure of 81 million UAH by the National Guard of Ukraine.
[ad_2]
