[ad_1]
According to Yuri Butusov, editor-in-chief of the Censor.NET edition, the new suspicion of the former People’s deputy Maxim Mikitas is not related to corruption.
The national police have raised suspicions against the former people’s deputy and former head of the state corporation “Ukrbud” Maxim Mikitas, who is already involved in the case of embezzlement of funds from the National Guard. About this, referring to sources, said the editor-in-chief of the publication “Censor.NET” Yuri Butusov on Facebook.
The new suspicion, according to Butusov, is not related to corruption.
The journalist also emphasized that such a decision came immediately after Mikitas’ request to Attorney General Irina Venediktova to return her case from the Security Service to the National Anti-Corruption Office, which is also the subject of the deputy head of the President’s Office Oleg Tatarov.
Mikitas is suspected of fraud with the purchase of apartments for the National Guard. According to the investigation, the National Guard and “Ukrbud” concluded an agreement, according to which a residential complex would be built on the territory of the former military unit, there the National Guard would receive 50 apartments and 30 parking lots. However, in 2016-2017, the parties entered into additional agreements, according to which the National Guard refused to receive apartments and parking spaces in Pechersk in exchange for 65 apartments in a house on the outskirts of Kiev. The examination showed that the cost of apartments in the suburbs is 81 million UAH less than the price of apartments in Pechersk.
Mikitashu is in charge of part 3 of art. 27, part 5 of art. 191 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (complicity in misappropriation, squandering of property or taking possession due to abuse of power).
On December 2, the National Anti-Corruption Office of Ukraine reported that Mikitas reimbursed the state 50 million UAH in damages, on December 3 it became known that Mikitas was released from the remand center under house arrest because he reached an agreement with investigation, partially admitted his guilt and agreed to compensate for the damages. to the state.
NABU director Artem Sytnik said that Tatarov “actually gave Mikitase a bribe.” The NABU director said detectives have correspondence between the OPU deputy director and other people involved in the production. Tatarov, in response, demanded to refute false information or publicly demonstrate evidence and stated that Sues the director of NABU.
On December 18, NABU handed Tatarov suspicions under Part 3 of Art. 369 (offer, promise or provision of illicit benefits to an official) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. On December 21 it was learned that he wrote a statement about the transfer of his powers to one of the deputy heads of the OPU. According to Butusov, Tatarov was not removed from office.
[ad_2]
