Supreme Court denies appeal in Tatarov case – latest news / NV



[ad_1]

This material is also available in Ukrainian.


Tatarov’s case was transferred to the SBU (Photo: wz.lviv.ua)

The legislation does not provide for the possibility of appealing the decision of the investigating judge to satisfy the complaint, said the press service of the Supreme Court on Facebook.

“On December 23, 2020, the Supreme Court’s Court of Cassation refused to open a cassation procedure in case No. 757/55167/20-k on the cassation complaints of the defense attorney of one of the suspects and the Prosecutor General against the judicial decisions of the Court of Appeal to confirm the decision of the Kiev Pechersk District Court of December 14, 2020, by which the Prosecutor General undertakes to resolve the dispute over jurisdiction in criminal proceedings and entrust the execution of the investigation prior to the trial in the same to another body of investigation, “said the court.

This decision of the Pechersk District Court was appealed to the Court of Appeal both by the defense and by the Prosecutor General.

“By the decisions of the Kiev Court of Appeal of December 18, 2020, both plaintiffs were denied the opening of the proceedings of their appeals because these complaints were filed against a judgment that is not subject to appeal,” he said. the court.

One of the defense attorneys for the suspects and the Attorney General appealed against the judicial decisions of the Court of Appeal. The Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court refused to initiate a cassation process on the complaints of both the defender and the Attorney General.

“As indicated in the decisions of the CUS of the Supreme Court, Articles 307 and 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine establish a list of decisions of the investigating judge that can be appealed during the preliminary investigation. At the same time, these articles do not contemplate the possibility of appealing the decision of the investigating judge to satisfy the complaint about the inaction of the prosecutor and the obligation to take certain actions, ”the court stressed.

The court report does not indicate the names of the defendants in the case, but from the number of criminal proceedings it is clear that the speech deals with the Ukrbud case, in which the deputy director of the OP Oleg Tatarov appears.

On the morning of December 24, before the start of the session of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, in which they were supposed to consider the request of the SAP to choose the person involved in a preventive measure, Deputy Attorney General Aleksey Symonenko changed his competition.

The office said «unprecedented interference in the investigation, “and the SAP noted that the Attorney General’s Office pays «exclusive attention “to this case, which may indicate its bias.

On December 18, the NABU said that it had informed Tatarov of suspected bribery in one of the episodes of the case involving the National Guard apartments. The suspicion was not delivered personally.

According to NABU director Artem Sytnyk, Tatarov, being a lawyer for Ukrbud, together with company owner Maxim Mikitase, gave a bribe in the form of a parking space to an expert from the State Center for Forensic Investigation of the Interior Ministry for underestimating the cost of a residential complex from 81 to 7 million UAH.

After the resonance around the case, NABU published the correspondence of its accused, in which Tatarov probably appears. And former Ukrbud co-owner Maksim Mikitas, who made a deal with the investigation, confirmed that he had previously worked at his company. «schematic specialist “.

Tatarov believes that the case against him was fabricated and intends «bring innocence through legal methods. “

The anti-corruption prosecutor’s office will request the arrest of Tatarov with an alternative to bail of 10 million UAH.

According to journalist Yuri Butusov, after SAP chief Maxim Grischuk signed a petition for a containment measure for Tatarov, Attorney General Irina Venediktova deprived him of his acting chief status. Deputy Attorney General.

Oleg Tatarov on December 21 reportedly wrote a statement on the suspension of his post as vice president of the OP. According to media reports, despite this, he continues to travel to the OP.

Tatarov became deputy chairman of President Andrei Yermak’s office on August 5, 2020. During Viktor Yanukovych’s presidency, he was head of the Main Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. His office was subject to the law of purification of power, but he managed to avoid depravity. In response to criticism of such a personnel decision, President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Interior Ministry under Yanukovych «there were professionals. “

[ad_2]