[ad_1]
Ex-coach “Jozsef Szabo expressed his opinion on the victory of the Kievites in the Champions League qualifying match over AZ (2: 0).
– For me, the match with AZ was a copy of the match with Shakhtar for the Super Cup. The main thing is the result, as I understand it. I don’t like this game, but I’m happy about the result. The “Dynamo” now cannot play any other way, although in Europe this type of football has not been cultivated for a long time, so the team plays only in its own half of the field. I understand that Lucescu needs a result, but how will he continue to play in the Champions League when the rivals are stronger? After all, the first half of the “Dynamo” performance is generally a shame.
The Dynamo scored the first goal after a colossal error in midfield, the goalkeeper brought the second. Sit back and wait for the opponent’s mistake? I do not like this game. This is not a criticism. I speak as a stuntman and former footballer. I can not see that. It is not football for me.
Also, I can say that the game “Shakhtar” – “Dynamo” in the ninth round of the UPL will be extremely difficult for the Kyivians. Shakhtar will play in a completely different way.
– It turns out that the coach of AZ did not see the match of the Ukrainian Super Cup “Dynamo” – “Shakhtar”?
– I was very surprised when he said he did not follow Ukrainian football. I immediately thought, “Well, you and the guy!” So I got mine – I went home with zero. He had no right to say that. I came to Ukraine and I don’t know the Dynamo Kiev team.
I was also surprised that the team that finished second in the Dutch championship does not have a player who can score. What did they want? We roll the ball around the perimeter and that’s it. Dynamo deservedly won.
– Is this a coach win?
– Of course. He gives you a task, chooses the players that suit you. Also, several key players are injured. The 18-year-olds go out and follow the coach’s instructions. Well done! But I want more. This team can do more.
– Who can you distinguish in the Dynamo lineup?
– What I liked the most was the efficiency of Gerson Rodríguez. He played throughout the field, both in the national team and in attack, and scored a goal. Fully dedicated to the game. The only question is, how long will it be enough to play with that beat? Simply prohibitive robotic ability.
I also liked Verbic. He was not dressed by other coaches like Lucescu. This is a good scorer. I am impressed by his style of play.
– Why did Dynamo look better in the second half?
– They played exactly the same as in the first, in counterattacks. At the end of the first half of the game, AZ got hooked, started making a lot of passing errors and by the second half they were already tired. The goal was scored more.
– Who is the favorite in the couple “Dynamo” – “Gent”?
– I think that in “Ghent” the players are weaker than in AZ, but the coaches of “Gent” have seen how “Dynamo” plays and they have already studied Lucescu’s tactics. The new coach will consult with our players, who know the Kiev game, communicate in the national team, and there the players share how they work in the clubs, especially with the new coach. So I hope it will be more difficult in the game against Ghent. If the Dynamo lose, Gent will sit on their doorsteps and play counterattacks in Kiev, and the Dynamo will find it difficult to play that kind of football. We have already seen it in the match against Desna.
