[ad_1]
The Germany – Ukraine match was in jeopardy after tests of four players from our national team yielded positive results. The fight finally took place, and this episode once again demonstrated the “disgusting side of football,” according to Germany. As much material is devoted to pre-game events as to the game itself.
For example, Spox’s Kerry Howe calls the pregame situation a “crown slap” and a “slap in the face.” “Soccer has a special place in our society. The German soccer union chose not to interfere, so as not to lose money for the broadcast of the game (ten million euros), this was done by the greedy UEFA, who wants to promote the pseudo-important League of Nations at all costs. The king of soccer does what he wants when incidence increases and new restrictions are introduced. Canceling a game that makes little sporting sense would be a good sign. ” Kicker agrees with this. “Football and UEFA missed this opportunity. Yes, professional soccer, like other industries, struggles to survive, but one might wonder why soccer players travel the world in search of dubious competition when the incidence of disease is increasing. “
“The German team won, but football lost,” writes Der Spiegel about the situation around the match, and the Süddeutsche Zeitung believe that the game “was a risk difficult to justify.
“Soccer, or the money it generates, rules the world. The footballers who play this game are no longer so important. Soccer is losing its soul, says Deutsche Welle author Jonathan Harding. – The football associations are doing their best to keep the show going at all costs. This is disrespectful. Yes, soccer players are athletes with exceptional physical abilities, but this does not make them immune to the virus and its spread. Also, the wealth of the calendar affects your physical and psychological health. Soccer wants to make you believe that soccer players are machines, but they are also people. “The fans support the opinion of journalists. In the survey” Should international games be played in this situation? “, Only 10% of respondents chose “yes”.
Whatever it was, the game took place. Germany overtook Ukraine and took the lead in the group. The German press, of course, talks more about his team’s game, but also honored Shevchenko’s team with various flattering comments. The kicker wrote that “the Ukrainian team played with courage, they did not hide, but luck was against them,” marking the moments with three bars.
Die Zeit, in an article dedicated to Leona Goretzke, calls the Ukrainian team the strongest “of the former Soviet republics” and points out how well Ukraine attacked with the left flank and quickly went on the attack. “They weren’t two goals weaker than Germany, but they couldn’t win, they didn’t have Goretzky.”
The Bayern midfielder received top marks from the German press and is recognized as the best player of the match by all. Only Bild gave marks to the Ukrainian team. Interestingly, the German tabloid gave Alexander Zinchenko the best score, and Matvienko’s game scored higher than Zabarny’s. (full list: Pyatov 4, Sobol 4, Matvienko 4, Zabarny 5, Hemp 3, Malinovsky 4, Stepanenko 4, Zinchenko 2, Zubkov 3, Yaremchuk 3, Marlos 3, Makarenko 4, Mikhailichenko 4).
Süddeutsche Zeitung called Ukraine a “respectable team”, highlighting our team’s counterattacks and their ability to “do something with the ball”. Deutsche Welle notes that the initial segment of the game was for the Ukrainians, but then praises Germany for being able to recover. Leon Goretzka also stands out: “Without him the Bundestim would not have won this match.”
After the Kiev match, Joachim Lev was and in the context of that Germany, Ukraine turned out to be an even weaker rival. This time Germany played better and the performance of the Ukrainian team also left a positive impression. Der Spiegel points out that Lev made the first substitution only in the 76th minute – he wanted to win a lot and was respectful of the opponent.
