[ad_1]
Defender of Desna Efim konoplya He commented on the result of the match of the 11th round of the UPL with Kolos (1: 1). Let’s remember that in the second half, the referee annulled Efim’s goal after seeing the VAR.
“Target canceled? It seems crazy to me to annul a goal for a moment that was 90 meters from the other goal and the ball has already passed three or four players, this is complete nonsense. Okay, a penalty – there was a hand in one case, and in the second, but canceling a clean goal, a clean one-on-one exit due to the fact that somewhere in the fight the ball bounced off someone’s hand. .. I do not understand how this can be judged.
Ball Scored? I took the ball, looked, there was no one, closed my eyes and hit. But this goal does not make sense, it was canceled anyway.
Draw: the result is not natural. We played better than Kolos, they had no chances, in the second half there were several long distance shots. It was easier for “Kolos” if the score was tied, they defended and ran well on counterattacks. Kolos played well in defense, it was difficult to beat them, especially in the first half, they moved very well. In attack they did not surprise much, but in defense they were good.
I had one more chance, but I got it wrong, of course, you need to score in those moments, “said Konoplya.
The moment with the disallowed goal – from 0:24
If you find an error, select a piece of text and press Ctrl + Enter.
[ad_2]
