[ad_1]
Makar BabokerSTAR (Yokneam ILIt)
11/18/2020 at 9:30 PM
Pani Julia! This is not your urine test, why didn’t you show it to us? UEFA protocol point one “If there are 13 players, including a goalkeeper with a negative coronavirus test, the match must take place” Ukraine has fulfilled this point. She had it. The second point about transfers does not apply to teams, it is about UEFA logistics. The third point The national team, for which the match did not take place, is recognized as a loser … Attention question: on what basis can a team be recognized as a loser if it has completed point 1 and is ready to play? Point four, if both parties are guilty or force majeure, then the draw is made. Can the Ukrainian team, which according to the first paragraph, was ready to play, be considered guilty? No. Can the Swiss team be considered guilty that, despite the fact that on the night of the 17th Ukraine announced that it was ready to play on the 18th, it began to release its players on the night of the 17th to the 18th? I think so. This is a unilateral violation of the regulations. The fact that cantonal medicine, contrary to UEFA protocols (13 players … will to play …), quarantined EVERYONE, can it be considered the fault of the Swiss Football Union, which does not did anything to prevent force majeure? Of course he can. But, to be realistic, then at least this is sheer force majeure. External circumstances of force majeure. The result of my analysis 50% – fault of the Swiss side … And if you do not have objectivity – then certainly 50% force majeure – any court in The Hague will confirm it. Then there is no loss. Either a victory or a draw. And the lawyers of the Ukrainian side must fight for it. There are enough arguments. And where is YOUR analysis, Mrs. Julia? It would be interesting to watch …
yerik (Chernivtsi)
11/18/2020 at 9:40 PM
Well written! And who will you be by profession?
