[ad_1]
Users of social networks are actively discussing the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to declare criminal responsibility for inaccurate electronic statements that do not comply with the Basic Law.
On October 27, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine declared art. 366-1 of the Penal Code, which establishes a criminal penalty for declaring false information. On October 28, the KSU published the corresponding decision.
Users of social networks have actively responded to this event. GORDON collected the most interesting comments.
“The Constitutional Court with its decision confidently pushes us back to the times [беглого экс-президента Украины Виктора] Yanukovych, destroying relations with the West. This is a setback and, unfortunately, so far there is only a bad scenario ahead, “shared his opinion Sevgil Musayeva, editor-in-chief of Ukrainska Pravda.
“Anti-corruption legislation was Ukraine’s main obligation in the negotiations on a visa-free regime with the European Union. Visa-free travel will not be canceled so quickly, but today we have taken a big step in this direction,” said journalist Vitaliy Sych .
“The Constitutional Court has become the collective younger brother of Viktor Yanukovych. The decision to actually abolish the electronic filing system is a threat to everything that has been done on the way to a civilized world for the past seven years. They want to. bring a dozen slaves to their knees in the Zhilyanskaya building and turn them into slaves of corruption, cynicism and muddy plans throughout the country “, – believes the former people’s deputy, deputy general director of Ukroboronprom Mustafa Nayem.
“I would like to point out that even in the Russian Federation, which is captured by OLL, there is legislation on the mandatory public declaration of the income of officials. These venal bodies of the Constitutional Court in alliance with [главой политсовета партии “Оппозиционная платформа – За жизнь” Виктором] Medvedchuk and [бизнесменом Игорем] Kolomoisky brought us down to such a point, where we can only respond with Somalia, “wrote the editor-in-chief of the Internet edition” Business Censor “Sergei Golovnev.
“Instead of conducting a survey with the question of life imprisonment for corrupt officials, it has been necessary to restore the composition of the Constitutional Court and the OASK, which openly work against the state and destroy anti-corruption achievements,” said the former political prisoner , Ukrainian director Oleg Sentsov.
The editor-in-chief of “Censor.NET”, Yuri Butusov, called the Constitutional Court’s decision an “anti-state rebellion.” “The decision of the Constitutional Court to abolish part 1 of Art. 366 – liability for illegal declaration – is a crushing blow to the entire anti-corruption system of Ukraine. This means that the goal of introducing electronic statements of public officials and the meaning of the work of the National Anticorruption Agency is annulled “. that.
“Unfortunately, in relation to today’s decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on anti-corruption legislation, Ukraine is at risk of being embroiled in a grandiose international scandal. The decision was made with flagrant procedural violations, which I previously reported, and is doubtful in terms of content, “said the representative of the Verkhovna Rada in the Constitutional Court Olga Sovgirya.
“That’s it, 2020, I surrender. What’s next? Cancellation of the Constitution due to unconstitutionality? Appointment of the Sexton at the NSDC? I have passed all the stages and I am ready for adoption. It is desirable to have something stronger,” he wrote blogger Roman Shrik.
Not without photojab.
***
***
[ad_2]
