[ad_1]
KSU judges Irina Zavgorodnyaya and Sergey Golovaty are subject to Article 366-1 of the Penal Code, which was canceled by the KSU, and in Vladimir Moisik’s statement, the NAPK found indications of a crime under Part 4 of the art. 358 – knowing use of a forged document
From open sources
The National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption stated that the judges of the Constitutional Court, in their own interest, canceled the criminal responsibility for lying in the statements, since some of them could be sanctioned. This conclusion was presented by NAPK on their page at Facebook.
“The NACC revealed signs of declaration of false information in two judges of the Constitutional Court – Iryna Zavgorodnya and Serhiy Holovaty. This is a violation of article 366-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.” The judges voted today to declare this article unconstitutional“, – says the message.
Thus, Sergei Golovaty’s statement for 2019 revealeds unreliableis reducedYana 3.6 million UAH In the statement of Irina Zavgorodnyaya for 2018 it was discovereds unreliableis reducedme by 615 Cerdocyon rrn, in the 2019 statement – in 754 Pigcyon rph.
The vote of the judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of recognizing unconstitutional article 366-1 of the Criminal Code indicates that Irina Zavgorodnyaya and Sergei Golovaty had a conflict of interest during their participation in the decision-making process. Conflict of interest with a judge Zavgorodney Also noted the representative of the President of Ukraine in the CCU, People’s Deputy of the “Servant of the People” Fyodor Venislavsky.
Further, during the audit of the annual statements of the judge of the Constitutional Court VladimirY MosesY northAPK established the signs of an offense under Part 4 of art. 358 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – the use of a forged document knowingly. Previously, the NACP also developed administrative protocols on the failure to report significant changes in property status by Constitutional Court judges Vladimir Moisik and Igor Slidenko.
Judges are prohibited by law from participating in the case to such conditions.
“The consideration of the case by these judges calls into question the objectivity of the Constitutional Court’s decision. And this is at a time when it is a case on which the future of Ukraine depends, its perception at the international level, the access Ukrainians to the truth about the life of officials “, – said PPresident NAPK Alexander Novikov.
It was previously reported that the Constitutional Court recognized criminal responsibility for inaccurate statements as incompatible with the Basic Law of Ukraine.
In early October this year, it was reported that 47 people’s deputies submitted a constitutional brief to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the constitutionality of certain provisions of the law on liability for illegal enrichment.
We will recall that the law of the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky on the restoration of criminal liability for illegal enrichment came into force at the end of November last year.
[ad_2]
