Romanov was forced to award a second penalty to Shakhtar’s goal. The grounds were, as in the first



[ad_1]

Difficult arbitration match … This result came after watching the fight between Zorya and Shakhtar (2: 2). However, the referees must be prepared and armed, because the fate of the players and teams depends on them. And here again I want to return to the subject of VAR: in games of this type, the system must be launched online and testing must be done in duplicate or youth team fights. At least Miroslav Stupar, who analyzed Vitaly Romanov’s mistake, is convinced of it. An error that influenced the course of the game, which could have been avoided with video replays.

– minute 27. Stepanenko played banally without success with the chest, pushing Kabaev. This is a violation. Make it formal, but a violation. Whether he wanted to play or not, but the contact occurred and after this contact Kabaev fell to the grass. What was Romanov supposed to do? Of course, to react the way you reacted: the expert pointed out.

– But Romanov was forced to draw a second penalty against the Pitmen early in the second half. Zorya attacked down the right wing, not far from the goal line in the penalty area. Kochergin controlled the ball, Solomon fought with it, but Kochergin deftly blocked the opponent’s path. Manor hit Kochergin in the leg, Zorya’s player fell, but Romanov did not react. I admit, the timing is difficult, “VARovsky”, but this still does not release the judges from responsibility. Also, an assistant could help, who should have seen better what exactly happened: said the former FIFA referee.

Remembered by Miroslav Stupar i Olimpik’s first offside goal against Minay… So, in summary, we can say that in almost all the fights of the third round of the UPL referee errors are noticed.

On refereeing UPL matches and more telegram channel >>>


[ad_2]