[ad_1]
GORDON publication founder Dmitry Gordon said he had interviewed the former Crimean “prosecutor” Natalya Poklonskaya, who approached the invaders because she was interested in understanding how and why the annexation of the peninsula by part of Russia. He is convinced that Ukraine will be able to use the statements made in the program in a lawsuit against the Russian Federation.
The founder of the online publication GORDON, Dmitry Gordon, said on the Ukraine 24 television channel on the night of May 12 that, as a journalist, you have the right to record interviews with everyone who interests you, in addition to a program with the Former Crimean prosecutor Natalya Poklonskaya can assist the Ukrainian state during trials against Russia.
Gordon said Poklonskaya herself made a proposal to record the show. Therefore, she responded to the mention in an interview with a Russian publicist and television presenter Alexander Nevzorov.
“They started teasing her … She wrote on her Instagram (and my subscribers gave it to me), they say, two people respected by me, Alexander Nevzorov and Dmitry Gordon, talked about me like that. But it’s weak to do Dmitry Gordon Is there an interview with me? Dmitry Gordon is not weak at all. During one of my YouTube broadcasts I said, addressing Poklonskaya that if you have a wish, I’m ready. I got a call [от нее]: “Natalya Vladimirovna is ready. May I contact you?” I replied, “Of course.” She calls me [и мы договорились]. The condition of the interview (the main and only one) was that there would be no invoices. I made it clear, I have no short moments, “Gordon said.
The journalist pointed out that with the help of his programs “writes the history of the country “, because its interlocutors – historical figures.
“This interview is very interesting to me and extremely important to our country. I have been consciously writing the country’s history for many years. It may be great, but it is true. My interlocutors are people who have become historical figures. And some day (I am absolutely convinced of this) history will not be studied according to through fake textbooks that are constantly reciprocated for the sake of the new regime, but based on the impartial or partial judgments of my interlocutors. ” – Gordon said
He noted that he was trying to understand the events of 2014 and understand why Russia was able to annex Crimea.
“I am very concerned about what happened to our country in early 2014. I can’t find answers to many questions, and I sincerely try to find them … Poklonskaya is a very important witness who sheds light on why Russia annexed Ukrainian Crimea. What happened Where does this total betrayal come from? Poklonskaya is a symbol of treason, because she is a citizen of Ukraine and at that time worked at the Prosecutor General of Ukraine. How did you become the so-called Crimean prosecutor? How did the Russians squeeze Crimea? What is happening today in Russia, the State Duma, Crimea? What does your love mean?[[[[to the last Russian emperor] Nikolay II and not perception of the film [российского режиссера Алексея] The teachers “Matilda”? Your qualifications [президента РФ Владимира] Putin and other statesmen? What doesn’t she like in Russia? Why do you yearn for Ukraine? This is all very interesting! And most importantly: what my interlocutors say, – These are eyewitness accounts to be included in the outline of Ukraine’s history. You can’t love Poklonskaya, you can love Poklonskaya, but it’s interesting to hear it. I am a journalist and I listen to everyone who interests me as a journalist. Yes tomorrow [бывший президент Украины] Victor Fedorovich [Янукович] I will go to an interview, I will be happy with him do ” – said the journalist.
Gordon added that he has so far found no answers to questions as to why the Ukrainian military and police agencies, as well as the Ukrainian authorities at the time, failed to protect the peninsula from Russian aggression.
“Why did the Ukrainian government, which at the time was in Kiev, refuse to fight for Crimea? Why was there nothing to fight? How much treason there was! For me, Poklonskaya’s treason was in the same category as the treason of the highest officials in Kiev who were not going to fight for Crimea “Just as we had no intention of fighting for the Donbass. Someone should ask these questions. They are interesting to me and I am looking for answers to them. ” – said the founder of the publication “GORDON”.
He noted that many journalists who criticized the interview with Poklonskaya are unable to record such shows, and announced another interview with a very resounding guest.
“We have many people in politics and in the journalistic community of people who are not mentally healthy, many miserable, gray and envious people. There are many people who simply cannot create anything, but who can criticize. I think for my country I have those Interviews I’m doing a lot. It’s not just an interview, it’s the documentation of the Russian aggression. It’s a big problem for the country. We only have conversations. And where are the documents? There are no documents. And those interviews are documents. The interviews with Poklonskaya they are flowers, soon they will be such berries that ra orvetsya to all who are now coming to saliva. This will also be a great event for our country, because it will be the most important document, which will allow Ukraine in court to defend its rights in those areas that are subject to Russian aggression. ” – The journalist is convinced.
Gordon noted that many critics did not watch the interview with Poklonskaya, but condemned him.
“It is bad to be losers and failed people. And it is very bad to be like before,” I did not read Pasternak, but I condemn them. “Those who spend time writing the answers for me (by the way, I don’t see them, because I am too lazy to look at mediocre and stupid people), it would be better to spend it to see an interview without cuts. From beginning to end. They will have the impression and understand the purpose and meaning of the interview, – The journalist advised.
He said that most of the former or current parliamentarians from the party of the fifth president Petro Poroshenko expressed their dissatisfaction with the interview.
“Do you know why? I constantly rebuke Peter Alekseevich. Pyotr Alekseevich himself said, or organized there, they say, Gordon needs to lightly tarnish his reputation, forgetting that usually impossible. In this case, we are talking about an interview, I repeat, with a person who has become a symbol of treason. And understanding this person’s anatomy and the anatomy of their actions is extremely interesting. I take on this role and help our state to draft court-relevant documents in a very correct way, including for The Hague. ” – Summed up the journalist.
Poklonskaya was an employee of the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office. TO 2012-2014 worked Senior Prosecutor at the Prosecutor General of Ukraine. In May 2014, shortly after Russia’s occupation of the Crimean peninsula, Poklonskaya appointed Crimean “prosecutor”. She held this position until October 2016, and then became a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation.
In Ukraine, various criminal proceedings were initiated against Poklonskaya, in particular, it is suspected that it invades the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine and treason. In Ukraine, they want it. Against Poklonskaya, the EU, the United States, Japan and other countries introduced sanctions.
May 11 on Gordon’s YouTube channel An interview with Poklonskaya came out. During the interview, she, in particular, spoke about the annexation of Crimea, about whether she had been recruited by the FSB of the Russian Federation, sanctions against her and treason. Gordon, among other things, asked Poklonskaya if she considers herself a traitor and if he feels used.
Several journalists and politicians have criticized the interview. They claimed that in this way Gordon legitimizes her in the Ukrainian information space. But the journalistic ethics commission said the program with Poklonskaya does not violate Ukrainian law and can be used against it during an investigation into the occupation of Crimea. The prosecutor’s office of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea said the interview will be attached to the materials of the criminal process.
[ad_2]
