The Supreme Court can still speed up Mueller’s grand jury case.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court awarded certiorari in a box office hit on whether Congress can access Mueller’s full report, which was not redacted. Special counsel Robert Mueller released that report just over a year ago, but Congress has not yet seen it in its entirety because parts of the report have withheld parts of the report that address grand jury matters. Now, the Supreme Court will decide whether Congress can see those grand jury redactions, as centuries past have dictated, or whether the Trump administration can continue to obstruct Congress’s legitimate request for oversight. But just as important as than the court decides is when It Decides The court must expedite your hearing of the case and decide this summer. Failure to do so will in effect grant President Trump a de facto victory by delaying the resolution of this case until after this congressional mandate expires in January.

The case refers to the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure which states that grand jury matters must generally be kept secret. Significantly, the rule in question, known as Rule 6 (e), has an important exception that allows district courts to publish such materials “in advance or in connection with judicial proceedings.” Citing that rule, last August, the Chamber requested that a district court publish the parts of the Mueller Report that were drafted as grand jury materials, arguing that an impeachment process is a “judicial process.” Almost a year has passed since that request.

As I have explained before, the House argument is backed by the text of the Constitution and a long history of congresses receiving materials from the grand jury. Regarding the first, the Constitution makes it clear that during the dismissal the Chamber functions as a grand jury and the Senate is a court that decides whether to dismiss the officials. In fact, Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution uses the language of judicial procedures, declaring that “the Senate will have the exclusive power to try all charges “that” no person shall be convicted without “a two-thirds majority, and that”judgment in Cases of Accusation will not extend beyond the removal of the Office. “In addition, Article III, Section 2 says that” the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment; will be by jury, “indicating that the accusation is a type of “trial” for “crimes”.

The precedent also supports the House’s request. In 1811, a grand jury in Mississippi territory forwarded his presentation to the House of Representatives specifying charges against federal territorial judge Harry Toulmin, who launched an impeachment investigation into the House. Most recently, during the Nixon impeachment, a district court sent grand jury materials on the Watergate investigation to the House Judiciary Committee. And the House received grand jury materials related to the indictment of federal judges in office in 1987 and 2010.

In particular, the Department of Justice spoiled to the publication of materials from the grand jury in these previous cases. But in keeping with its pattern of obstructing legitimate oversight of Congress, the Trump administration has refused to turn over the Mueller Report to Congress and has not been drafted, and has fought that disclosure for nearly a year in federal court. The administration lost both in the DC District Court and in the United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit of the District of Columbia. On Thursday, however, the Supreme Court agreed to hear this case on the merits, setting up another highly successful fight over whether Congress can carry out legitimate oversight of this president.

The problem with the court order granting the case is that he couldn’t say when I would hear it And with this case, timing is everything. Usually, when the Supreme Court grants a case, it looks for more information, listens to oral arguments, and then issues a decision months later. In this case, the ordinary procedure would mean that there will likely be an oral argument this fall. And that would make a final decision on the unlikely matter before 2021.

But if the court subscribes to that ordinary procedure in this case, it would result in a de facto victory for the Trump administration. even if the court finally decides that Congress is right about the law. As I have explained before, the Chamber is not a continuous body, and the current Congress exists only until January 3, 2021, at which time its ongoing investigations will end, its citations will expire and a new Congress will be sworn in. therefore, if the case is not discussed until the fall and is not decided until the spring of 2021, the elections will end and 116^th Congress will have suspended a long time ago. Congress needs to see the full Mueller Report now, during this Congressional period, to decide whether it contains evidence of impeccable conduct. In summary, if the Supreme Court does not decide this case in a timely manner, there is a real risk that even if Congress should Having access to these grand jury materials, Trump will manage to run out of time and delay any decision until it’s too late.

Fortunately, there is a precedent for the court to hear important cases like this on a fast schedule, even during your typical summer vacation. In United States v. NixonFor example, in a case about compliance with subpoenas by a president, the court heard an argument on July 8, 1974 and decided the case just two weeks later, on July 24, during its summer vacation. Bush v. Gore It is another good example of expedition. The Supreme Court decided two cases stemming from the Florida count in the 2000 election in approximately three weeks between Thanksgiving and Christmas of that year. In short, the court can act quickly when it wants to.

Finally, the expedition is especially guaranteed here since there are Not which is why this case cannot be heard in an accelerated way. In fact, the parties have already reported on this issue twice in the lower courts, so they can expeditiously file reports with the Supreme Court. Judges may be used to taking summers out to a great extent, but for an issue as important as this: whether Congress can complete a major investigation of foreign interference in the 2016 election and President Trump’s efforts to obstruct the Mueller investigation Holidays can wait. To ensure that President Trump does not stay above the law, and that Congress can complete his legitimate investigation in a timely manner, the court must hear this case this summer and decide quickly.

For more information on Slate’s news coverage, subscribe to the Political Cabinet at Apple podcasts or listen below.