Big selling point for Advanced micro devices‘ (Nasdaq: AMD) The PC CPU’s Raison line, which the company launched in 2017, had many cores of not having much money. Chips achieved excellence in functions that could take full advantage of many cores. The problem for AMD was that PC gaming is not usually one of those tasks.
The first three pay generations of AMD’s Raison processors offered attractive value for certain types of users, but competitors Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) Remained in the lead in terms of single-threaded performance. Modern PC games can use multiple cores to varying degrees, but the performance of a single core is often more important than the number of cores for overall performance.
With the Raizen 5000 series, the fourth generation of AMD’s Raizen Desktop CPU, the company finally reaped an advantage that Intel maintained during the Raizen era. The new Raison chips not only perform well in multithreaded functions, but they also outperform Intel in gaming performance. That would have been inconceivable a few years ago.
Image Source: AMD.
The new CPU king
“From the other end of this review, it’s hard to imagine the extent to which AMD’s operations have grown over the last five years,” reads Anandtech’s in-depth review of AMD’s new Raisin chips website.
AnandTech confirmed that AMD’s claims about single-threaded performance gains were accurate. AMD said the Zen3 architecture on which the new Raison chips have been built will offer a 19% jump or IPC in instructions per cycle over the previous payover.
A single-threaded display is a combination of how many instructions the CPU core can process per cycle and the number of cycles the CPU core can run per second. Enjoy an average 24% single-threaded performance gain for newer chips, combining fast frequencies with impressive IPC advantage.
It translates single-threaded performance gains into direct sports performance. AnandTech tested a large suite of games, and found that AMD’s new processors often come on top. In some cases, the $ 299 Raisin 5 5600X also beats the more expensive i9-10900K than Intel.
Tom’s hardware summed up the problem for Intel in its review of the high-Raisen 5000 chips: “So far, there’s no reason to recommend the Intel Comet Lake processor on the high end, unless you need integrated graphics, so we now have that budget option.” Wait until Intel lowers prices to reflect that reality. “
Intel will try to fight next year
Intel plans to launch new Rocket Lake Desktop chips early next year, aiming to compete with AMD’s existing impressive Raisen chips. That new chips will bring Intel closer to AMD in performance, but that’s not enough for Indel to regain the lead.
Rocket Lake chips will only go up to 8 cores, while AMD’s $ 799 Raizen 5950X has 16 cores. Rocket Lake will also be built on Intel’s 14nm production process, which is very mature and heavy and pliable at the moment, but the fact of the matter is that it has been in use since 2014 as Intel struggled with volume production on its 10nm process. AMD now uses a mature 7nm manufacturing process Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing For its Raisen 5000 chips.
With Intel losing the gaming crown at AMD, lower prices could be the only play the company can play if it wants to reap the benefits of AMD’s market share before launching a well-performing CPU. AMDA has increased prices with its latest Raisin chips, reflecting the fact that Raisin is now a crop cream. It gives Intel some room to play with its own pricing to better compete.
For the first time in a long time, Intel chips are not the best choice for PC gaming. The combination of good products from AMD and poor implementation from Intel has dramatically changed the balance of power in the PC CPU market. That’s good news for gamers and AMD, and bad news for Intel.
