On Friday, Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Camero indicated he would appeal if O’Connell allowed the jury to speak. He filed a motion by the state seeking stay on any order allowing the state’s big juhur to speak in public when the case is appealed by the state or additional relief is sought.
The filing by the grand jury attorney, obtained by CNN on Sunday evening, says the cameras have made many public statements and announcements about the grand jury process, but that is preventing the grand judges from doing so.
“The anonymous grand jury submits # 1. The attorney general may not choose to participate in the disclosure rules and then use his position to prevent others from responding to his misleading remarks,” the filing says.
The manner in which Cameron handles the case filed by Anonymous Jury # 1 and discloses publicly about the grand jury proceedings makes it clear that it is his place, which was not recorded by him, but no one noticed. Should have the same capacity otherwise, no matter how inconsistent her public statements may be in actual recordings, ”Grand Jury Attorney Kevin Glogore told the court.
The grand jury indicted former detective Brett Hankison for endangering three proud Wonan, but none of the officers involved in the raid directly charged Taylor with death.
The unnamed jury went to court to review the information and documents demanded by the grand judge, as well as a “binding declaration” outlining the grand jurors’ right to public disclosure about the case. His attorney says he is concerned that what was presented to the judges has not been made public.
According to the filing, when the state appeals the case or seeks additional relief, Cameron’s request for a stay, if granted, will prevent the jury from speaking.
Part of Cameron’s filing on Friday argued that failing to stay proceedings before the state could appeal would “cause irreversible damage immediately.”
“The grand jury has been secretive for centuries. Research has not found a Kentucky case that allowed her to violate her oath, and a sister state has denied a similar request in a very similar case. There is no doubt that presented. The question is significant and deserves really appealing review, ”the document continues as part.
Judgment of the court case is pending
In October, Glover argued in a Kentucky court that the juror specifically “wanted to talk about his service on this grand jury” and “is not trying to participate in the global debate on gender relations.”
Glogavar argued that Cameron opened the door to publishing grand jury material when he was discussing grand jury proceedings during a press conference in September. Glogavar said the comments surrounding the proceedings are “completely undisclosed secrecy.”
In his response, Attorney Victor Maddox argued on behalf of the Commonwealth of Kentucky that intelligence surrounding the grand jury was “fundamental” to the criminal justice system.
The grand jury found Hankison guilty of three counts of serious criminal endangerment and pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Cameron led the police investigation into the murder and presented evidence before a Jefferson County grand jury the other day last month.
However, the recording does not include juror discussions or the plaintiff’s recommendations and statements, Cameron said.
Glogavar had earlier told CNN that some key information was missing in the published recordings.
.
