Bair acknowledged that his new instruction has gone beyond the Department of General Justice’s practice of not conducting a full-scale investigation into allegations of such fraud until the election results have been verified. However, the attorney general said the policy made little sense in cases where there was a suspicion of fraud that could affect the outcome of the election.
The words of Burr’s memo could not be ascertained as he largely supported the president’s supporters as he anticipated a serious investigation into last week’s election, of which Biden was declared the winner on the trip.
“While serious allegations should be handled very carefully, specific, speculative, fictional or far-reaching claims should not be the basis for initiating a federal inquiry,” Barrow wrote. “There should be no indication that nothing is taken here that the department has concluded that voting irregularities have affected the results of any election.”
Some twelve critics argued that the directive was little more than aimed at spreading misconceptions that the 2020 presidential race had an impact on vote rigging on a serious basis.
“Let’s be clear – this is about disruption, disintegration and sowing chaos,” said Vanita Gupta, who heads the civil rights department under Justice Barack Obama. Wrote on Twitter In response to the word bar move. “Trump is angry, he wants all his lawyers to take action. They have no evidence so they will push PR. “
Gupta, chairman of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, added, “Voters decided on the election and chose Biden in large numbers.” “The election was safe and fair. There is no real basis for the memo. Fear about starting an investigation doesn’t change the outcome. “
