[ad_1]
The civic group voted to remove Kaohsiung City Councilor Huang Jie, not only did he miss the threshold of 72,892 votes, but the number of votes for approval was 1,130 less than disapproval. Scholars have analyzed that the main reasons for withdrawal failure are insufficient reasons for withdrawal, lack of legitimacy, and difficulty in obtaining public approval.
▲ Academics revealed the reason the case was not approved. (Photo / Central News Agency)
The removal of non-party member of Kaohsiung City Councilor Huang Jie is the second time that the Kaohsiung people have exercised their right to remove citizenship after they removed former Mayor Han Guoyu from office. “Recall” is not the first time for the people of Kaohsiung, nor is it unknown. Voters use their votes to show the will of their citizens. As a result, there are more votes against recall than for approval.
As a result of the vote for the revocation, 65,391 votes (54..20%) that do not agree with the revocation were 11,130 votes more than 55,261 votes (45.80%) that were agreed to revoke. The outcome of the withdrawal showed that the retaliatory withdrawal failed, and also motivated the anti-deportation party. After the withdrawal case of former Taoyuan City Councilor Wang Haoyu, it had a hemostatic effect.
The result of the recall vote to rescue Huang Jie as a city councilor amounts to affirming his performance and efforts in the past two years. Yang Junchi, a professor in the Department of Political Science and Law at Kaohsiung University, noted that the “lack of legitimacy” of the reason for the expulsion is one of the important factors. Insufficient reasons for withdrawal are naturally difficult to resonate. Furthermore, Huang Jie’s performance in the parliamentary inquiry and the DPP’s solidarity mobilization ultimately ended the call for failure.
Weng Mingzhang, an associate professor in the Department of Applied Economics at Kaohsiung University, believes that the reasons for the expulsion are neither specific nor insufficient. In particular, the firing groups insisted on linking the firing grounds to the anti-Laizhu, and the results showed that they could not gain public approval.
The voter turnout rate for the strike was 41.54%, equivalent to 42.14% of the voter rate from South Korea’s strike last year. It was also in line with 41.83% of the partial mayoral elections. The figures show that the public’s concern for Huang Jie is not lost with the South Korean election and the by-election for mayor. Inspire comparable participation.
In fact, the dismissing party assessed that there is a possibility of accessing the dismissal because the Fengshan district is the headquarters of the official Army academy. In the past, blue iron vows were mainly used. In the 2020 legislative elections, Li Yajing, representing the KMT, also won 86,127 votes, the blue field supporters still have a chance to win.
However, if we look at the election results of Kaohsiung City Councilor Fengshan (9th constituency) in 2018, 8 seats should be elected. The Kuomintang was elected 4 seats, the DPP 3 seats and Huang Jie was nominated for the power of the Times. It seems the Blues won, but the underlying basic drive “green is greater than blue” is worth looking at.
In the parliamentary elections two years ago, the Democratic Progressive Party nominated five people, and Taiwan’s Kijin and Shili nominated one each. The election result was lost to the “Korean Wave” and hostile attacks from friendly parties. The DPP won 3 seats and lost 2 seats. However, with time-consuming power and basic Taiwan advancement, “Pan-Green” got 48.25% of the vote, beating the KMT by 45.43%.
Regarding the results of the 2020 legislator election in Fengshan District, the Kuomintang appointed City Councilor Li Yajing to challenge re-elected DPP legislator Xu Zhijie. As a result, Li Yajing received 86,127 votes (38.27%), far less than the 114,998 votes (51.1%) for Xu Zhijie, who was nominated by the DPP to have the qualifications of second mayor of Fengshan.
If merged in the 2020 general election, President Tsai Ing-wen will have 138,172 votes in the Fengshan district, which is 82,432 votes more than the Kuomintang Han Yu, which is a net of more than 50,000 votes. Fengshan “green is greater than blue” Basic board is beyond question.
Today’s strike resulted in “disagree” with more than 10,000 more votes than “agree.” In addition to the full urgency of votes from the beneficiary party, Fengshan’s core market “green is greater than blue” is also a factor in favor of anti-removal. .
According to the final results announced by the Central Election Committee, the voter rate for the removal of Huang Jie was 41.54%, of which 65,391 votes were disapproved (54.20%) and 55,261 votes were cast (45.80 %).
