The Kuomintang party emblem appeared in 1895, and the proposal not to dare to change the national emblem to green forced the Kuomintang to change the party emblem-Yahoo News



[ad_1]

Seventeen DPP lawmakers, including Chen Mingwen and Wang Meihui, proposed to amend the “Law on Political Parties”. The national emblem of the ROC is similar to the emblem of the Chinese Kuomintang party. To avoid confusion among the population, it is proposed to amend Article 14 of the “Law on Political Parties”. If the national flag and national emblem are the same or similar, if the offender does not make the corrections within a time limit or the corrections still do not meet the requirements, they will not be presented. The case will be sent to the Legislative Yuan Program Committee next week. The DPP group expressed its respect for the members’ proposal and does not have a specific position. Kuomintang lawmaker Chen Yixin criticized the DPP as a habitual offender of reversing black and white. The national emblem comes from the party emblem. The DPP in full power did not dare to change the national emblem and in fact forced the KMT to change its emblem.

It is too similar to the national emblem to call for a revision of the “Law of Parties”.

In late September, DPP legislator Fan Yun and others proposed amendments to the President and Vice President Oath Regulations, the “Oath Regulations,” and the “National Emblem and National Flag Act,” requiring the President and the Lower officials at all levels and the representative of the People’s Republic of China do not have to swear to the image of the father of the nation. Administrative agencies, schools and troops do not have to hang a portrait of the father of the nation. When the proposal was sent to court for processing, the KMT group objected and the DPP group did not express an opinion and it was returned to the program committee. After Fan Yun proposed again, the KMT still objected, but the DPP group supported her and passed a vote to pass the first reading. Submitted to the Legal and Judicial Affairs Committee for review. It has raised concern if the “Law of parties” advances in this way.

The emblem of the Kuomintang party came from the revolutionary martyr Lu Haodong of the late Qing dynasty who participated in the Xingzhonghui led by Sun Yat-sen. The “Qingtian Bairi Flag” was designed during the first uprising in Guangzhou in 1895. It was used in revolutionary uprisings many times in the future until the official establishment of the Kuomintang in 1919. After the promulgation of the “National Emblem and Flag Law national flag of the ROC “in 1928, the Qingtian and Bairi flag was used as the national emblem and the” red “image was added as the” national flag “, replacing the national flag of the” five-color flag “in the early days of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.

Blue and green history upside down and participate in ideology

Chen Mingwen, who was born in the Kuomintang, spearheaded the proposal this time. The proposal established that the national emblem is a symbol and sign of the sovereignty of the ROC. It is commonly used on the flags and emblems of the national army and public security agencies and should not be used as the insignia of a specific political party. Taiwan has been democratized for 30 years. If the insignia of a single political party is very similar to the national emblem, then there will not only be doubts about the independence of the party and the state, but it will seriously damage the neutrality of the national flag and the national emblem.

The Chen Yixin Blue Commission criticized him. The Green Commission accused the Kuomintang of using the national emblem as the party’s emblem to reverse history. In fact, “there is the national emblem before the national emblem”, and the two are different. It is stepping forward, seizing party assets, seizing affiliated organizations, and now even seizing the party emblem, which is very outrageous. Li Yanxiu, undersecretary of the Kuomintang, also bombarded the Democratic Progressive Party for its inability to rule the country, just ideology and lack of democratic literacy.

[ad_2]