[ad_1]
Political Center / Full Report
Fierce clashes broke out in the Yuan Legislative Council on November 27. To prevent Chief Executive Officer Su Zhenchang from coming to power, the Kuomintang regiment spilled pork offal in the forum, causing a foul smell and drawing criticism. In this regard, former KMT Chairman Hong Xiuzhu said yesterday (30) that people who opposed these issues in the past, where did their doubts go? Where is your conscience? Is it true that as long as I change the color to govern, ECFA will not be a problem, direct cross-strait flights will be safe, and ractopamine will not be toxic?
▲ Hong Xiuzhu said that if he could do politics rationally, how could he boycott it? (Image / photo data)
Hong Xiuzhu said that last week Su Zhenchang, under the “protection” of the DPP lawmaker, “recited” his political speech in five minutes in a refreshing way. The Legislative Yuan protested that KMT legislators used pork offal. It has sparked a lot of discussion, DPP members shouted “Enough trouble” and some young people even asked Kuomintang legislators “Can’t you ask the government well?
Hong Xiuzhu pointed out that he really wanted to ask the DPP government, who is “causing trouble”? In the past, under the strict rules of “separation of cattle and pigs”, “exclusion of internal organs”, “mandatory labeling” and “safety tolerance”, the KMT opened the importation of American cattle “under 30 months of age “and the DPP had to occupy the presidency. For five days and four nights, what are the obstacles to using the same standard to demand the government of the DPP? What can the KMT do, why can’t the DPP stop doing it?
He said bluntly, if they can do politics well and rationally, how can the Kuomintang legislators be willing to vigorously boycott? In the past, the DPP’s political inquiries in the Legislative Yuan were far inferior. In 2007, when it revised the Central Election Committee’s organizing bill, the DPP also used superglue to fill locomotive locks to block the forum; in 2009 she even sent pregnancies and feet. The injured legislator takes the rostrum! In the last eight years of opposition, the DPP boycotted more than 2,000 times and took the rostrum almost a hundred times. Is it a “rational questioning of politics”?
“Pork intestines, pork belly and pork entrails fly around the forum. They may be dirty, smelly and unsanitary. But my friends, is the forum unhealthy or is it because the Chinese will eat it from New Year’s Day? New next year and does it contain ractopamine? Are pork entrails relatively unsanitary? ”Hong Xiuzhu criticized that the DPP has only one ideology and does not have objective standards on many livelihood issues. In the past, ECFA was called” poison. coated in sugar “and threatened people with direct flights across the Strait to cause a” massacre of Trojan horses. “It also paralyzed discussions on these issues many times, but what about? The DPP has not interrupted the ECFA or their travels. Even ractopamine meat, offal, and even beef older than 30 months that were opposed in the past are open to import. We also want to ask people who opposed these issues in the past. Where is your questioning voice? Where is your conscience? Is it true that as long as I change the color to govern, ECFA will be fine, direct cross-strait flights will be safe, and ractopamine will not be toxic?
