[ad_1]
The first debate of the 2020 elections is due to the fact thatTriumphThe president continued to interrupt and grab words, drawing constant criticism from the public. As the host of “Fox News Sunday” (Fox News Sunday), the main presenter Wallace (Chris Wallace) was also criticized and criticized for not stopping immediately. Trump’s out-of-order behavior; Wallace, 72, said in a media interview on the 30th: “I feel sad about the situation last night.”
The Presidential Debating Committee has stated on the 30th that it will discuss and amend the way the next two debates will be conducted, but still praised Wallace’s performance as “very professional and skilled.”
In a telephone interview at his home in Annapolis, Maryland, Wallace said his role as host of the debate on the 29th arguably was “seriously wrong.” “I never dreamed that it would be out of place. It is so.”
Throughout the debate, Trump frequently opposed Democratic candidates.BidenInterrupted in his speech and rushed to talk to Wallace, Wallace admitted that his response was too slow that night when he was interviewed. In fact, he should have been on the alert that Trump would never abide by the rules of the debate.
Wallace said that at the time he did not see that this was Trump’s strategy, “I am an insider, but I have never experienced such a situation.”
Trump’s performance in the debate was described by many netizens as “intimidation,” and Trump also complained; Wallace’s voice was a little hoarse and he said, “I saw some comments made by netizens. I know everyone’s opinion is What? I should stop it first.”
The CEO of conservative media “The Blaze”, Tyler Cardon, criticized Wallace’s tweet on the night of the 29th. Shortly after the debate ended, Trump was retweeted.
Carlton wrote: “No matter who you support, I think everyone will agree that if you ask Joe Rogan to host, you will perform better than Wallace.”
Logan, a comedian, is the former host of the reality challenge television show “Fear Factor” (Fear Factor) and said on the podcast that he should act as the host of the debate.
Wallace said that shortly after the debate opened, when Trump first violently attacked Biden, “I was thinking in my heart right now that this is great. This is called a debate.” However, Wallace soon realized that the situation could be bad, because Trump did not intend to stop when he spoke.
Wallace told Trump at the meeting: “Your campaign team agrees that both sides will have two minutes to respond without interference. Why don’t you follow the rules your team agreed to?”
Regarding Trump’s non-compliance and frequent disruptions, the 72-year-old Wallace struggled to control the scene. Every now and then he would exude the principal’s teaching tone to the students and say, “Mr. President, I am the host of this discussion. I hope you can. I ask questions and then you answer.”
Unprecedented! Trump Nominates Barrett to Pass Pre-Election Vote
A week after liberal US Supreme Court Justice Kingsberg died of illness, President Trump announced on the 26th that he had nominated conservative federal Justice Amy. Barrett presents an appendix. If the nomination is approved by the Senate, …
Arguing is not a curse! US to establish stricter rules in television debates
US presidential candidate, current President Trump and Democratic challenger Joe. The first televised debate between Biden was obviously an ebb in the culture of American political debate. This shameful war of words full of personal attacks and slander soon fell into chaos …
Dissatisfied with Biden’s accusations of abuse of Brazilian President Posonaro’s tweet counterattack
The far-right Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro (Jair Bolsonaro), responded today to the American presidential candidate Joe Biden, because Biden is working with …
Trump Biden’s Tongue War Keyword Rushing To The Top Of Google’s Sizzling Search
The first television debate between the president of the United States, Trump, and the Democratic candidate Biden ended. Not only did it not help much in answering voter questions, it also left more doubts, leading many people to turn to Go …
Trump evades condemnation of far-right organizations
US President Trump named the white supremacist organization “on hold” during yesterday’s debate, prompting his opponent Biden to angrily criticize “national shame.” Republicans have also drawn a clear line; seeing the turmoil, Sichuan …
See the First Allies of the US Presidential Debate: Shocked and Tired by The Guardian: National Shame
The first presidential debate fell into disarray, causing many US allies and opponents to feel shocked, sad, and bored. They questioned whether American democracy is enough to continue leading the world. The Guardian summed up the thirtieth with the term “national shame.” After the debate, the Global Times, a spokesman for the Communist Party of China, believes that the rowdy Trump-Biden debate is fit to represent the decline in American influence and national power.
The presidential debate is chaotic, disorderly and unstoppable, will the civil war fall?
The first televised debate of the presidential election took place on the night of the 29th. Nearly 100 million people in the United States watched a live broadcast of two white elders yelling at each other. But the debates were out of order and the rules. Trump was rude and tough, constantly robbing white people, choking on host Wallace many times, and yelling at each other with Biden. Some people feel that even my children who argue in kindergarten are more law-abiding than the American president’s debate; European media generally laughed at the chaotic debate, leaving the world ashamed to see American democracy.
Unstoppable off duty Trump Wallerstein admits the reaction was too slow, “I didn’t expect the president to play by the rules
In the first debate of the 2020 elections, the constant interruptions and impersonation of President Trump drew constant criticism from the public. As the host of “Fox News Sunday” (Fox News Sunday), the main presenter Wallace (Chris Wallace) also Under review and criticized for not immediately stopping Trump’s disorderly behavior, Wallace, 72, said in an interview with the media on the 30th: “I feel sad about the situation last night.”
After watching the debate, the votes are still floating, choosing one of the two can become “neither of them”.
When the first debate of the presidential election took place, there were only a few voters who had not yet decided who they would vote for.In the eyes of this group of undecided voters, the performance of the two candidates in the evening debate on the 29th , President Trump is considered “inexplicable”, “arrogant”, “insanity”, “intimidation” and “typical Trump”; Democratic candidate Biden is described as “political”, “nothing new”, “Leader”, “Rehearsed”, “Good people”, “Sympathy”, “Clearly organized” but also “blink”.
The presidential debate is chaotic to help you find five things to watch
The first presidential debate in 2020 ended in chaos on the night of the 29th. The disruptions and disputes continued to make people unbearable to witness. The Washington Post (WP) and The Associated Press have compiled the following five highlights.
The debate resounds without listening to the most important political opinions
The first presidential debate in 2020 ended on the night of the 29th. President Trump continued to interrupt Democratic presidential candidate Biden’s speech and was mixed with a host of personal attacks. Biden also fiercely defended himself. On the contrary, it was difficult for both parties to fully express their political views.
Worst presidential debate in history Biden: by embarrassing America, Trump consciously wins
The first presidential debate held five weeks before the elections was in chaos, what can be called the worst presidential debate in history; Democratic candidate Biden said the debate has humiliated the United States; White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany) said President Trump was very excited when he stepped off the debate stage, felt he had performed well, and won.
Total 0 Comments
- When posting articles or tagging, there must be no comments that violate the law or infringe the rights and interests of others, and violators will be held legally responsible.
- With regard to deliberately false or overly emotionally abusive comments, if reported or discovered on this website by netizens, Lianhe News has the right to remove articles, suspend rights, or disqualify membership. Those who do not agree with the above specifications, please do not post articles.
- For tags that are meaningless, unrelated to this article, deliberately false, or abusive, Lianhe News has the right to remove tags, suspend rights, or disqualify membership. Those who do not agree to the above specifications should not affix the label.
- When “nicknames” imply verbal abuse, swearing, or infringement of the rights of others, Lianhe News has the right to remove speeches, suspend rights, or cancel membership. Those who do not agree with the above specifications, please do not post articles.
