[Observación del West Bund]Is California the initiator of voter fraud in the United States? | Election fraud | Election fraud | Vow Harvest



[ad_1]

[La Gran Época 7 de noviembre de 2020]Hello everyone! Welcome to West Bund Observation, I am Lin Xiaoran. Overnight, Trump’s leadership in the swing states Penn and Georgia disappeared. With the tally of votes sent, Biden surpassed Trump in these two states, and the Democratic Party is ready to celebrate Biden’s election at any time. . However, the votes in Pennsylvania and Georgia are too close, with a gap of only 0.3% and 0.1%. At least Georgia has announced that it will recount votes in accordance with regulations. Therefore, Biden cannot yet declare victory.

Michigan’s vote-counting software passively voted for Trump but gave Biden

On the other hand, more methods of electoral fraud have been exposed, especially in Michigan, a key state with 16 electoral votes. The software reported for the vote counting was obviously manipulated. Obviously it was Trump who voted for the ballot, but the software put the result in Biden. The first to report the matter was a worker at a local polling station in County Antrim. Subsequently, Trump’s team and the local Republican Committee filed a lawsuit asking County Antrim to count the votes rather than manually. As a result, Trump’s vote in the county shifted, beating Biden.

County Antrim initially reported that 62% of voters voted for Democratic presidential candidate Biden. In fact, this county is a red county. Trump led Democratic candidate Hillary Hillary by 30 percentage points in the 2016 general election. So when 62% of Biden’s votes came out, a lot of local people couldn’t believe it was true. Later the voting staff member came out to report and said there was a problem with the counting software.

In this way, through manual vote counting, Trump ultimately got 9,783 tickets locally and Biden got 7,289 votes. Compared to the initially announced results, the updated vote count has added more than 5,000 votes to Trump, with Trump leading Biden by 14 percentage points. But this is not just the case for one county in County Antrim. Polls in 47 counties in Michigan use this deliberately tampered vote counting software. Now that Biden has nearly 150,000 more votes than Trump in Michigan, how much water is added?

Why is there too much of a difference in votes between Biden and his party members in the swing states?

On election night I did a live show. Current affairs commentator Lan Shu and I keep looking at the number of votes in those undecided states. At the time, Trump was in good shape. Trump led with nearly 117,000 votes in Wisconsin, nearly 300,000 votes in Michigan, 700,000 votes in Pennsylvania and 77,000 in Georgia. Both Lan Shu and I think that Trump won these changing states at the rate of turnover at the time. But in the early hours of day 4, the situation changed dramatically. There is only one place in Wisconsin called Milwaukee County (Milwaukee County), and suddenly 170,000 absentee votes appeared, directly causing Biden to surpass Trump. The same technique also appeared in Michigan, where suddenly 138,000 mailed votes were added. The strange thing is, none of them voted for Trump!

Judging by the current billing results in the United States, some people on the Internet also analyzed that the results were obviously abnormal. According to common sense, most voters have “one vote for the end.” In other words, voters support a party’s presidential candidate, and the majority of them will support the party’s candidate for Congress. I support Trump, so there is a high probability that he also supports the Republican candidate for Congress in our district. Yet the results of this year’s vote show that the difference between the number of votes Biden “gets” in swing states and the number of Democratic candidates is too great to be reasonable.

Twitter users listed the data, as in Michigan, Trump and Republican Senate candidate John. The gap in the number of votes for John James was 7,131 votes, while Biden and the candidate for Democratic senator Gary. The vote difference between Gary Peters reached a staggering 69,093 votes. In Georgia, the situation is even more obvious: the vote difference between Trump and Republican senators is only 818 votes, while the vote difference between Biden and Democratic senators is 95,000 votes. This phenomenon is quite strange, how can so many people elect only the president and leave the column of senators empty?

Today, a Twitter netizen posted several videos, showing that there are staff members at the voting table, not one person, but several, sitting there suspected of smearing the ballot and then sealing the ballot. If this is a ghost, it’s not hard for everyone to know why Biden’s vote suddenly came out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C4_CGkX9xY

The vote harvest has a long history: Is California the initiator of electoral fraud in the United States?

There is a Republican candidate for Congress in California named James P. Bradley, who, in an interview with Epoch Times reporters, pointed out that these electoral frauds that occurred today have, in fact, been in California for a long time. Like vote-by-mail and “ballet harvest.”

What is “harvesting votes”? This term was coined by the California Republican Party and means the act of collecting votes on a large scale. When a voter in California is unable to go to the polling station to vote in person for some reason, a volunteer will come and say, I will help you send the vote to the polling station or elections office. This increases the possibility of altering the votes or of this volunteer inducing the voters. California Democrats pushed for legislation in 2016 to legitimize this kind of “vote harvest.” Bradley believes that the California Republican Party vote in Orange County in the 2018 midterm elections changed from red to blue, with Democrats taking away all seven Republican seats in Congress because of this ” collection of votes “.

Give a realistic example. In the 2018 midterm elections, Orange County’s 39th election was fiercely contested for the seat of the Federal House of Representatives. Republican Rep. Ed Royce has been working here for more than 25 years. He wants his former assistant. The Republican candidate, Young Kim of Korean descent, may be successful. On the night of the vote, Jin Yingyu once beat wealthy Democratic candidate Gil Cisneros by nearly 3,900 votes, yet the local vote-counting job couldn’t finish because there were still missing ballots that were not counted.

Ten days after the end of the general election, Xijili’s votes began to outnumber Jin Yingyu. After another week, Xijili finally won by more than 4,000 votes, which took Jin Yingyu’s supporters by surprise. At the time, he was sure that Jin Yingyu would be elected, and he even went to Washington DC to participate in the training of new council members.

Jin Yingyu is not reconciled and will fight again this year. Three days after the general election, he currently has fewer than 2,500 votes ahead. It is said that there are more than 20,000 votes that have not been counted. It is estimated that when the result comes out, the scene from two years ago is likely to be reassembled, and Hijili will back down and win.

I also have a personal experience of “harvesting votes”. I used to meet the community when I was a journalist. Everyone knows that Chinese in San Francisco live together, especially in Chinatown. There are many older Chinese who have immigrated from Guangdong. They do not speak English and generally live in welfare apartments provided by the government. After naturalization, this group became the main target of the vote. Not only do Chinatown constituencies value these Chinese votes, but all city and state elections go to Chinatown to promote and build momentum. But these Chinese elders don’t know about politics. They only know how to follow the organization. This organization can be started by a leader of a Chinese overseas and can sometimes fight for these elders for small benefits, free lunches, etc. So the leader of the Overseas Chinese firmly held on to the votes of these people.

In the 2015 City Council elections in the Chinatown constituency, a group of Chinese electoral helpers told me that they wanted to distribute flyers in the elderly apartment, but the administrator supporting the other group blocked them because of a leader of a Chinese Foreign. I have already spoken, strict control of the entry of outsiders for advertising. During the general elections, they collected the votes of these elders and voted for the candidates of the other faction. It’s always like this all the time.

There is also a mail-in ballot. Generally speaking, Republican voters are more inclined to go to the polling station to vote in person, which is why Trump moved ahead of the first ballot on voting day. The enthusiasm of Democratic voters is actually not as high as that of Republicans, so they expect more Democratic voters to vote by mailing ballots. All tickets are sent to your home and you can send them unsealed.

In California, including Los Angeles County, the number of registered voters in many counties has exceeded the total number of residents who have reached the legal age to vote. Many people who have moved or died are still registered. This year, California has mailed all ballots. These unclaimed ballots can easily be collected and used for skewed voting.

The Democratic Party has savored the sweetness of mail-in ballots, which is why after this year’s epidemic, many Democratic states have begun fully implementing mail-in ballots. California Governor Newsom even proposed this week that the full implementation of the postal ballots should be fixed in the future, regardless of whether there is an epidemic or not. You said, can the Republican Party rise up in California in the future?

Judging from the current situation, the Democratic Party has fully passed the California experience to the indecisive state. This year Trump has already begun to suffer this loss.

Okay, that’s it for today’s show. If you like my show, please like it, subscribe and forward it. See you next time!

Editor in charge: Wang Xi

[ad_2]