[ad_1]
Later, state officials declared these abandoned roadside voting machines to be outdated and discarded.
A woman living in Dahlonega, Georgia posted the news on social media Facebook. He said he found it on the lawn of the Blueberry Hill Bar and Grill on Dean Forest Road in Garden City. These machines.
According to photos he posted on Facebook, one of the voting machines was marked “Fulton County” and had a machine number on it.
As of Friday morning, her post has received more than 1,000 comments on Facebook and shared 4,600 times.
The Georgia Secretary of State’s office issued a statement Thursday night to the effect that they are investigating the source of these machines.
The statement read: “The Secretary of State’s Office is investigating an unused voting machine found on the road. These voting machines appear to have been shipped to the Port of Savannah and are part of a used equipment lot.
The statement read, “Georgia no longer uses this type of machine. It cannot affect the 2020 elections because it cannot print ballots, and our state has completely switched to paper voting.”
Georgia is a key state in the 2020 general election. Current President Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Biden have just 0.25% of the vote in the state. Manual counting was adopted, but vote counting does not include signature verification and identity verification. And other content.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced Friday that Biden won the state with 13,000 more votes.
It issued a press release stating that the maximum error between the count of counties and the machine count was 0.73%; final vote count in most counties was unchanged; the number of votes in most counties changed within 10 votes.
But the Trump campaign pointed out that the audit of the firms only re-counted fraudulent votes, and they refused to admit the results. Garland Favorite, co-founder of an electoral integrity monitoring organization in Georgia, also said he does not believe the recount will result in Georgia due to serious loopholes in ARLO auditing software used locally.
According to a 2012 study from Rice University and Clemson University, manual counting of votes in the post-election review or recount process can result in an error rate of up to 2%.
Editor in charge: Lin Yan #
