Former CISA director said the safest choice was rejected by the senator | Rand Paul | Congressional Hearing | Electoral fraud



[ad_1]

[La Gran Época, 17 de diciembre de 2020](Reported by English Epoch Times reporter Tom Ozimek / Compiled by Xie Jiaxuan) US Senator Rand Paul (Rand Paul) in the 2020 presidential congressional elections on Wednesday (December 16) The “Illegal Behavior” hearing declared that there was electoral fraud in the November elections, and the shadow of the theft of elections has been seen in many aspects.

Listen to the news:

(For more news, visit the platform “Listening Epoch”)

The Kentucky Republican said in a hearing before the Senate Committee on Government Affairs and National Security that he believes the fraud allegations in the 2020 election are credible and that he denied Democratic Senator Gary Peters (Gary Peters). ) The fraud is not broad enough to influence electoral arguments.

At the hearing, Peters questioned the claim that voter fraud affected the election results and said that integrity-enhancing measures taken by the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) prior to 2020 elections were “very successful”.

Paul said, “We can’t just say it didn’t happen. We can’t say, ‘Oh, 4,000 people voted in Nevada and they’re not (US) citizens.” Then ignore it. ” He said: “The fraud happened, the elections have been stolen in many ways, and the only way is to strengthen the law in the future to solve this problem.”

Paul also questioned the claim of Chris Krebs, who had signed a joint statement between CISA and an alliance of the electoral infrastructure advisory committee before Trump was removed from office. The statement declared that this election was “the safest in the history of the United States.” “There is no evidence that any voting system eliminated or lost votes, changed votes, or violated principles in any way.”

Krebs told the hearing: “Although the election is chaotic at times, it is a safe election.” It also said that it endorsed the earlier statement issued by CISA. President Trump has challenged and opposed the statement and subsequently fired Krebs.

Paul said that Krebs’ job as head of CISA at the time was to prevent foreigners from voting in elections and to prevent the dead from voting, but he never voiced his opinion on whether the dead voted.

“I don’t think I have studied this topic.” Paul noted that Krebs did not say whether he investigated the no-referendum, but said “this is the safest election.”

“Of course, if you mean foreign intervention, then I agree with you. But if you say that based on the fact that no dead vote, there is no referendum, no one violates the absenteeism (voting) rule, it is the ( choice) safer, me. Thinking this is wrong, this is what makes many people on our side dissatisfied, that is, they understand your statement as “Oh, choice is not a problem,” said Paul.

Before his removal, Krebs had repeatedly stated that the elections were held safely, although he later clarified that his comments did not refer to allegations of fraud. He wrote on Twitter on November 18: “I never said there was no election fraud because this is not CISA’s job. It is a law enforcement issue. We provide election officials to prevent and detect deaths.” Information on voter action. “

Paul also stated that he hopes to hold hearings next year on electoral arrangements, including controversies that restrict the participation of courts and election officials in amending the electoral law, as mentioned by the Republican Party in litigation in key states of the field of battle.

“I think the state legislature needs to reiterate that the election law can only be amended by the state legislature.” Paul said the US Constitution delegates the power to enact election laws to the legislature, not to the courts or election officials.

Editor in Charge: Lin Yan #

[ad_2]