[ad_1]
After Zhongtian News withdrew from the cable channel, it switched to the Internet channel, however, a National Communications Commission (NCC) article in the PO was suspected of implying that it would regulate speech on the Internet, which blew up public anger over speech control. In response to this, executive Yuan Su Zhenchang Jin said in an interview that he respects the NCC.
Regarding a post in the NCC, which raised questions about whether to control the Internet, Su Zhenchang said in a joint media interview: “The NCC is an independent agency and the members of the NCC have been reviewed and approved by the Legislative Yuan. We all respect the exercise of powers in accordance with the law. ” After Su Zhenchang finished speaking, he turned around and left, not answering further.
NCC posted on Facebook on the 11th that the rise of the Internet has not only brought comfort, but has also caused the problem of false statements on the Internet. It has also become a question of whether online platform operators should be held accountable for statements posted by others on the platform. Popular topics.
The NCC cited the 1995 Stratton Oakmont V Prodigy Service lawsuit in the United States as an example, stating that the New York State Supreme Court ruled that BBS, an online platform operator, did not remove the inappropriate comments, but was liable. . The key is in the BBS claims that it has a filter to filter out inappropriate comments. The software is not running, so you must be responsible. In other words, if the platform industry doesn’t have any measure to inspect content, it doesn’t need to be held accountable.
The NCC further stated in the article that that decision has created an actively managed platform and should instead be held responsible for others spreading false information on the platform. Therefore, he urged the approval of the 1996 CDA (Communications Decency Act, translated as “Communications Decency Act”). Article 230. The platform industry is encouraged to use filtering software to remove inappropriate content and other reasonable management content, and the industry need not be responsible for comments posted by others on the platform.
At the end of the article, NCC stated that the United States has not yet reached a conclusion on whether CDA section 230 should be amended or removed. Congress also has many bills and proposals, and subsequent developments are worth noting.
NCC posted a message on the eve of the Zhongtian shutdown. Time is really delicate. It has prompted questions from netizens that “NCC will start running the Internet.” The Zheng Liwen Blue Commission bluntly stated that the heart of Sima Zhao is well known to passersby, and the NCC post confirms the pursuit of Zhongtian politics.
NCC was quick to put out the fire on the 12th and cleared up. For this US case sharing case, I originally wanted to share network monitoring cases in various countries with the public, but it caused misunderstandings among people. Some netizens alluded to “NCC referring to Internet control.” Sorry, Po Wen will be more cautious in the future.
(Zhongshi News Network)
[ad_2]
