[ad_1]
At the eighth local time, the US Supreme Court rejected a request by Pennsylvania Republicans to block the certification of the state’s election results. Nine judges reached a consensus resolution, not even the three judges nominated by the president of the United States himself, Trump. All Trump.
CNN commented that this was almost a fatal blow to the GOP’s hopes of invalidating Biden’s victory.
CNN noted that the Supreme Court ruling was a devastating defeat for Trump. He often boasted that the Supreme Court could overturn his electoral defeat.
The ruling issued by the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday was just one line long, and none of the nine justices disagreed or commented. The Supreme Court of the United States currently includes 6 conservative justices and 3 liberal justices. The 6 conservative justices include Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh personally nominated by Trump. Kavanaugh) and Amy Coney Barrett.
This ruling also marks the first time that Trump’s newly appointed Judge Barrett has made a statement about an election-related dispute.
Just hours before the United States Supreme Court issued this ruling, Trump directly appealed to state officials and Supreme Court justices for help in subverting the election results, and repeatedly falsely suggested that there was a ” electoral fraud “on a large scale during elections.
Trump said, “Let’s see if anyone has the courage, be it a legislator, a legislature or a Supreme Court justice. Let’s see if they have the courage to do what everyone in this country knows is the right thing to do.
Steve Fradeck, a law professor at the University of Texas, said swift justice action without public dissent is a sign that the Supreme Court may not want to get involved in Trump’s ongoing campaign to challenge the election results. .
He said: “The justices only issued a ruling without a separate opinion. This is a strong signal that the Supreme Court intends to avoid disputes related to the elections and to allow the electoral process to continue.”
Under Pennsylvania law, Tuesday is the state’s “safe harbor” deadline. This means that when the United States Congress counts the electoral votes in January of next year, it must accept the confirmed electoral results before the deadline.
In the weeks leading up to the US Supreme Court order Tuesday, Trump and his allies have been denouncing large-scale fraud in the US presidential election, saying their second term was “stolen.”
Last week, Trump declared in Georgia: “We will still win.”
So far, electoral demands started by the Trump campaign in various US states are quickly being dismissed or abandoned. And before Tuesday, many sources told CNN that Trump’s team of lawyers also began to realize that the legal effort was ending.
The magistrates only issued a sentence with no separate opinion, which is a strong signal that the Supreme Court intends to avoid electoral disputes and allow the electoral process to continue.
At the eighth local time, the US Supreme Court rejected a request by Pennsylvania Republicans to block the certification of the state’s election results. Nine judges reached a consensus resolution, not even the three judges nominated by the president of the United States himself, Trump. All Trump.
The ruling issued by the US Supreme Court on Tuesday was just one line long, and none of the nine justices disagreed or commented.
The Supreme Court of the United States Image: Obtained from Facebook of the Supreme Court of the United States
[ad_2]
