[ad_1]
The legislator of the Democratic Progressive Party, Cai Yiyu, proposed a revised draft of the Regulation of Popular Relations of the Strait, eliminating the word “national reunification”. The Taiwan Affairs Office responded to the solemn warning to Taiwan’s separatist independence forces. Image: Recovered from the Legislative Yuan (data photo)
The legislator of the Democratic Progressive Party, Cai Yiyu, proposed a revised draft of the Regulation of Popular Relations of the Strait, eliminating the word “national reunification”. The Taiwan Affairs Office responded to the solemn warning to Taiwan’s separatist independence forces. In response, Cai Yiyu said the anger of the Taiwan Affairs Office puzzled him: “Did China want to be unified by us and go liberate Taiwan?”
Cai Yiyu proposed an amendment to the Regulations on Relations between the People of Taiwan and the Mainland, which changed the word “national reunification” in Article 1 to respond to national development; in articles 26-1 and 63, the word “national reunification” was changed to “national jurisdiction AND when the Golden Horse of Taiwan and its affiliated islands”.
When the Legislative Yuan deals with the issues reported on the 8th, it will approve Cai Yiyu’s proposal at first reading and present it to the Internal Affairs Committee for review. Cai Yiyu said in an interview yesterday that he actually proposed amendments to the constitution, which led to changes to the corresponding cross-strait popular relations regulations.
Because the deadline for the proposal was just before President Tsai Ing-wen 520 took office, the move sparked external discussions. Ma Xiaoguang, spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council of China, said: “For a period of time, it has been extremely dangerous for a small group of Taiwan independence separatists to misjudge the situation and try to drag the car over. on the way to seek “independence”.
Regarding the warning from the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, Cai Yiyu said in a statement today that his constitutional amendment defends that if it is about reunification, independence and continued maintenance of the status quo, it is a possible option for the development of this country and must respect the national self-determination of 23 million Taiwanese; The current amendments have only a single “national unity” option, which is not in line with the diversity of national development options.
Cai Yiyu said that he did not abandon reunification, but only took it into account, but the anger of the Taiwan Affairs Office puzzled him: “Does China want to be unified by us and go liberate Taiwan?”
The legislator of the Democratic Progressive Party, Cai Yiyu, proposed a revised draft of the Regulation of Popular Relations of the Strait, eliminating the word “national reunification”. The Taiwan Affairs Office responded to the solemn warning to Taiwan’s separatist independence forces. In response, Cai Yiyu said the anger of the Taiwan Affairs Office puzzled him: “Did China want to be unified by us and go liberate Taiwan?”
Regarding the response of the Taiwan Affairs Office to the solemn warning from the Taiwan separatist forces, Cai Yiyu said that the anger of the Taiwan Affairs Office puzzled him: “Did China want to unify us and go free? Taiwan? ” Photo: Taken from Cai Yiyu’s Facebook
[ad_2]
