China’s Great Foreign Propaganda Enrages the World Mark Hong Questioned Beijing’s Anti-Epidemic Effectiveness | International | Newhead Shell Newtalk



[ad_1]

In an exclusive interview with the Financial Times published on the 16th by French President Mark Hong, he expressed doubts about the true effectiveness of controlling China's epidemic and would not naively believe that China's anti-epidemic is better. Image: Reprinted from facebook.com/EmmanuelMacron

In an exclusive interview with the Financial Times published on the 16th by French President Mark Hong, he expressed doubts about the true effectiveness of controlling China’s epidemic and would not naively believe that China’s anti-epidemic is better. Image: Reprinted from facebook.com/EmmanuelMacron

In an exclusive interview with the Financial Times published today by French President Mark Hong, he expressed doubts about the true effectiveness of managing and controlling China’s epidemic, nor would he naively believe that resistance to China’s epidemic is better. The Figaro newspaper also published an article today to discuss how China’s big ad campaign “irritated the world.”

French President Emmanuel Macron said in an interview with the Financial Times published today that there are still many gray areas in controlling China’s 2019 coronavirus disease epidemic (COVID-19, Wuhan pneumonia). Retained attitude: “We will not naively believe that China’s anti-epidemic is more successful. We do not know. Obviously something happened that we did not know.”

Mark Hong’s reservation about Beijing’s anti-epidemic effectiveness is the same as that of the British and American governments. Britain also warned China today that it must answer the “difficult question about the origin of the virus and why it was not prevented earlier.”

Karine Lacombe, director of the Center for Infectious Diseases at Saint-Antoine Hospital, also revealed tonight on the BFM television show that many doctors who have publicly questioned the falsification of China’s epidemic data have received letters one after another. China has not concealed any epidemic situation and does not understand why the other party raised questions, etc., which has repeatedly shown that China is actively propaganda.

Coincidentally, the French newspaper Le Figaro published an article today “China’s external propagation infuriates the world,” analyzing how Chinese propaganda methods infuriated the world. The article first describes the expedition of Chinese netizens to Thai netizens, which not only resulted in complete defeat, but also spawned the “Milk Tea Alliance” and anti-Chinese sentiment in Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian geopolitics expert Sebastian Strangio noted that “the epidemic has sparked potential anti-China sentiment in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations for a long time in the past.”

The report writes that China’s grand outreach strategy not only tries to cover up China’s responsibility for the epidemic, but also strengthens its internal control to reiterate the superiority of the CCP’s general secretary, Xi Jinping, under the leadership of the upcoming matches.

However, in recent days, Chinese diplomacy has continuously caused a rebound. In addition to Mark Hong’s skepticism about China’s anti-epidemic effectiveness, French Foreign Minister Lederian also called on the Chinese ambassador to France, Lu Shaye, to express his discontent with China’s relevant words and deeds. The same thing happened in Kazakhstan. The “discrimination” suffered by African diasporas in Guangdong, China was condemned by African leaders.

These rebounds prove the risk of Beijing’s reach, and China has been flaunting the “China model” for several weeks, emphasizing the failure of Western countries to deal with the epidemic. Antoine Bondaz, a researcher at the Strategic Research Foundation (FRS), analyzed: “The Chinese authorities have opened the battlefield in an attempt to strengthen their argument for crisis in other countries and to make criticism disappear.”

The Trump administration accused Beijing of “covering up” the severity of the outbreak in China during the initial outbreak. On the 14th, the United States froze funding from the World Health Organization and criticized its position for being too central.

In an exclusive interview with the Financial Times published today by French President Mark Hong, he expressed doubts about the true effectiveness of managing and controlling China’s epidemic, nor would he naively believe that resistance to China’s epidemic is better. The Figaro newspaper also published an article today to discuss how China’s big ad campaign “irritated the world.”

French President Emmanuel Macron said in an interview with the Financial Times published today that there are still many gray areas in controlling China’s 2019 coronavirus disease epidemic (COVID-19, Wuhan pneumonia). Retained attitude: “We will not naively believe that China’s anti-epidemic is more successful. We do not know. Obviously something happened that we did not know.”



[ad_2]