Chief’s “Captive” State Green Space Annoyed Councilor Ke Yizheng’s Criticism: Too Trivial To Be Blocked For Public Welfare Use | Apple News | Apple Daily

Director Ke Yizheng said in a Facebook post that his home is surrounded by a plaza surrounded by four avenues. The absurdity is that there is no small park for people to rest, no public green space or large tree to relieve the Mao children. . I also questioned the fact that there were two vacant lots in the li, but one was surrounded by the li to grow vegetables and the other was not open to the public and was still closed. Ke Yizheng claimed to have drawn one more dog on the sidewalk as a “soft protest” and said this is what he wanted to do last year. Although it is not perfect, it is considered complete.

Ke Yizheng’s post caught the attention of many netizens. Some netizens left a message directly saying that Director Ke was funny. Other netizens questioned whether the director was suspected of embezzlement. Others asked which one it was on. Ke Yizheng directly left a message to reply “Jian’anli.” “Apple News” consulted with Wen Jinliang, the head of Jian’an District, Da’an District, and Wen replied and explained that he had adopted the two fields in the office, and one was opened for local people to grow vegetables. with him, and growing vegetables was just fun. That’s. The other was adopted last year, mainly because the open space was too cluttered, with iron sheets, steel bars and stones, it is still in the process of greening and is not suitable to open to avoid dangers.

Wen Jinliang also pointed out that Director Ke is his neighbor. She knows that she often takes dogs for walks and loves animals very much. But he’s puzzled why she didn’t contact him directly. The reason he closed the land he adopted to the public last year. It is to facilitate management and prevent people from entering and getting injured. It is necessary to fix it at present, and last year the grass was pulled up, and in the future other operations such as greening will be carried out. It will open to the public once greening is complete.

Guo Guanlian, the secretary of the Da’an District Office, said that one of the lands adopted by Chief Charlie belongs to the Water Conservation Association. Since the general agencies are not willing to allow private owners to adopt the land, the water conservation association signs a contract with the office and the director will take care of it. While the adoption is being handled, it will not occupy public land, and the adopter must fulfill the management responsibility.

Northern City Councilor Li Mingxian said that the adoption of public lands by the district chief should be for public welfare purposes, and the public agency would agree to adopt them. It cannot be used for personal use. If it’s locked for maintenance, it would be too delicate. After all, adoption is not The home is concerned with preventing theft and does not need to be locked. Li Mingxian also pointed out that although Director Ke’s protest method is very creative, he personally recommends the rational use of formal channels to protest. The markings on the sidewalks are for public use and penalties for violations must be borne by them.

Guo Guanlian pointed out that because the land was messy and untidy, the chief had spent money to organize and care for it. Even if the boss was confined, it might be necessary to keep the open space clean and prevent others from damaging or discarding it, and even preventing the puppy from urinating and defecating. It is true that there is no rule stating that locks cannot be locked when applying for adoption. The locks can only show respect for the resident. If there are outdoor activities, the resident will also be open for use.

Wen Jinliang confessed that when he adopted two public office land, he did not take the initiative to inform residents, but the property rights belonged to the Water Conservation Association. The vacant lot was originally dirty and smelly for more than 40 years and had a lot of trash. He used the help of volunteers and neighbors to organize himself. Later, he also spent more than 30,000 yuan in office expenses to install iron gates and buy tools, redo fences and locks, but he never closed them or restricted people’s access.

Regarding fencing and blocking of state-owned land after adoption, does it imply occupation of public lands? Lawyer Zheng Xiuhui stated that since the district chief has taken public office, he will manage the public lands on his behalf. There is no so-called usurpation problem. The district chief can explain that locking and locking the land is an overly desirable measure based on security during the maintenance and management process. Sometimes it is necessary to spray pesticides. Blocking can also be for people’s safety. Blocking does not mean embezzlement. It’s just that everyone’s feelings vary from person to person.

Liu Jiayou, the Chief Engineering Department of the Beijing Municipal Transfer Office, responded that changing or modifying the markings of the sidewalks without authorization has violated the “Road Traffic Management Punishment Regulations.” The fine can be between 1,200 and 2,400 yuan according to the law. Tomorrow we will send staff to the site to delete the marks and transfer the relevant information to Da’an Branch for confirmation or arbitration. Liu Zhixiong, the leader of the Da’an branch trafficking group, said that he would read the monitor screen and that as long as the perpetrator can confirm the fact that the perpetrator has violated the regulations, he will be fined 1,200 yuan. according to regulations.

(Lin Yuanling / Taipei Report)