[ad_1]
In an interview with Newsmax TV host Grant Stinchfield on Tuesday, Securo said: “The Supreme Court is not only considering the lawsuit filed by Texas (on Tuesday), they are now taking the next step.”
He said the Supreme Court requires Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. These four battlefield states must respond to the Texas Attorney General’s allegations of voter fraud by 3 p.m. ET Thursday. “.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit in the United States Supreme Court on December 8, accusing the four states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin of using the (CCP virus) epidemic. To illegally modify the electoral regulations, he petitioned the Federal Supreme Court to declare the electoral results unconstitutional in these four states.
Paxton stated in the indictment (click here) that these states used the CCP virus outbreak as an excuse to amend electoral laws without legislative procedures, through administrative orders, or by mutual agreement, weakening the integrity of the elections.
Additionally, the Texas lawsuit also stated that different counties within the same state have different voting rules and procedures, which violates the “Equal Protection Clause” of the constitution.
Paxton petitioned the Supreme Court to prohibit the counting of electoral votes in the four aforementioned states, and at the same time asked the Supreme Court to order states that have appointed electors to reappoint electors in their assemblies.
“This is a case that we have been talking about and it can be notified to the Supreme Court of the United States. This is a case that has a decisive impact on the result. This affects 62 electoral votes, which is enough to change the results. of choice, “said Seculo. It is the main challenge we were waiting for. “
Seculo said the Supreme Court has “original jurisdiction” and will weigh the litigation and propose remedies for the legislature to organize new voters.
“These are constitutional challenges posed by Texas,” Sekulo said. “These are specifically aimed at the core of the constitutional challenges.”
“This is different from most cases in the Supreme Court, because this is a first instance jurisdiction case … because it is a state-to-state trial,” he added.
Moderator Skinfield noted that Louisiana is in the process of signing the Texas complaint, and more states may grow to join related lawsuits.
After Texas filed the lawsuit, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt tweeted that he would support this lawsuit against the state of the battlefield. He wrote: “Electoral integrity is the core of our Republic and I will protect every aspect of it.”
“As I have done in other cases, under my leadership, Missouri will support the Texas litigation in the United States Supreme Court today,” he wrote, “Missouri is in battle.”
Electoral integrity is fundamental to our republic. And I will defend it at every step.
As I have done in other cases, I will help lead the effort in support of Texas. ‘ #ESCOTO presentation today.
Missouri is in the fight. https://t.co/V3aLHrYnOF
– Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) December 9, 2020
Editor in charge: Ye Ziwei #
[ad_2]
