[ad_1]
Just as President Trump and his allies filed electoral lawsuits in key states one after another, but lost one after another, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit in the United States Supreme Court on the 8th, indicting Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Winning Biden states such as Wisconsin have illegally changed electoral rules on the basis of the new crown epidemic, so the outcome of local elections should be illegal. However, electoral law experts believe that the Supreme Court is unlikely to accept the case.
According to the US media “CNBC”, Paxton pointed out in this unprecedented election lawsuit that Georgia and four other states used the new crown epidemic as an excuse to illegally change electoral rules, such as not requiring the voter to personally sign and authenticate, No witnesses are required and the number of votes sent by mail is doubled, reducing the legitimacy of the vote and requiring that the electoral college formed by the presidential election in these states is not counted in the electoral college vote on the 14th.
Trump previously accused on Twitter: “The governor of Georgia refused to sign the vote. If he wanted to, I would have won it. What’s wrong with this guy? Who’s behind him?” Trump’s lawyer trainer , Zhu. Rudy Giuliani had previously said that even counting the votes in Georgia would not make sense, “after all, those votes were fraudulent,” but he still included them in the calculation.
The US media outlet “Newsweek” noted that if the judges decide to exclude the electoral votes of these four undecided states from the official calculation, Biden’s electoral votes will be drastically reduced from the current 306 votes to 244 votes. Trump has more than 232 votes, but less than 270 votes for the White House, so this demand is very important to the Trump field. Trump also won all four states in the 2016 election.
However, the accused states, including Georgia, have voiced opposition to the Texas Attorney General’s complaint. Georgia Undersecretary of State Jordan Fuchs said: “Texas claimed we had 80,000 forged signatures on the absentee ballot, but they did not provide evidence. This is because this did not happen at all.” Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel also stated that this type of lawsuit is just a publicity stunt, not a serious court appeal, and Paxton, who is not a voter in these four states, is actually “undermining the influence of voters. in the American democratic system. ” Trust “must be condemned.
In addition, Paul Smith, an expert on electoral law at Georgetown University Law Center, also believes that the Supreme Court should not accept Paxton’s “unprecedented” lawsuit, which states that “There is a complete electoral system in Pennsylvania and other I don’t think the Supreme Court is interested in handling “and the Texas Attorney General has to provide the legal requirements to sue him, he will inevitably run into difficulties.” Just because he didn’t vote for Trump, Texas will have to impeach another in the Supreme Court The state voting method is wrong, I think the two are not related. “
(Zhongshi News Network)
[ad_2]
