[ad_1]
Zhongtian News officially left Channel 52 at 0:00 am today (12) and switched to the Internet to continue talking; However, NCC yesterday cited foreign precedents on Facebook fans, citing whether the Internet platform should publish articles for others. Responsibility is already a topic discussed by all walks of life. This statement is interpreted, if the NCC will “control the Internet” in the future? After Zhongtian transfers to new media, will he remain restricted in speech? It sparked a heated discussion among netizens. Many netizens looked stupid and called NCC to finish processing Zhongtian, “Is it our turn now?”
NCC stated yesterday on Facebook that with the recent internet boom, the use of Facebook, BBS, Instagram, etc. it has become part of our daily life. Besides convenience, it has also caused problems with false statements on the Internet. Internet platform operators Being responsible for the comments posted by others on the platform has also become a hot topic.
For example, NCC noted that in the 1995 Stratton Oakmont V Prodigy Service lawsuit in the United States, the New York State Supreme Court ruled that the Internet platform operator BBS did not remove the inappropriate comments, but was liable. The key is that BBS stated that it had leaked the inappropriate comments. Filtering software is not running, so you must be responsible. In other words, if the platform industry doesn’t have any measure to inspect content, it doesn’t need to be held accountable.
The NCC believes that the result of the ruling caused an unreasonable phenomenon that the industry actively managing the content of the platform should be held liable for the dissemination of false information by others on the platform. Therefore, the United States passed CDA Section 230 in 1996 to encourage platform operators to take reasonable steps. So the platform industry is not responsible for the comments posted by others on the platform. Today, whether the CDA230 should be modified or removed has become the focus of the US responsibility to the Internet platform industry. Congress has many bills, and subsequent developments are worth noting.
This statement was interpreted as after Zhongtian shut down and switched to the internet, did NCC turn its spear on the internet and begin to examine internet talk, and “encourage” internet platform operators to manage the content of the platform? When Peng Huaqian, a media veteran, appeared last night on the scene of Zhongtian’s “Last Night”, he also said that after Zhongtian was put on the Internet, the Times Force really said, why can’t the Internet control it? ? The meaning is to kill them all. Under the control of the Democratic Progressive Party, what future does Taiwan have?
The NCC article also caused many netizens to worry about whether in the future, the platform operators would start to uncover their favors and conduct censorship, bluntly saying, “Now Zhongtian is gone, it’s our turn!”
Some people even quoted and adapted the “confession” of German Shepherd Martin Nimora during World War II, saying, “At first when the DPP captured Zhongtianren, I was silent because it was not Zhongtianman. Finally, when they came to arrest Zhongtianren. Zhongtianren. When I was, no one stood up to speak for me anymore. “
(Zhongshi News Network)
[ad_2]
