[ad_1]
27-year-old actress Ji Pai Mei (real name Zheng Jiachun) accused of sexual harassment in a series of explosions. She successively posted Taiwanese song king Weng Liyou and famous host Zeng Guocheng to be rude to her, causing an uproar. the burning has not abated yet. In this regard, Li Maosheng, a law professor at National Taiwan University, expressed his opinion on Facebook, listing two points that constitute sexual harassment, which was praised by Internet users.
The chicken cutlet sister bravely exposed Weng Liyou in the tail teeth activity and took the opportunity to touch his buttocks, but Weng Liyou denied that either side became Rashomon, leaving the outside world confused about who told the truth. Li Maosheng said bluntly: “Let me. What I feel is very unbearable is the argument that whether sexual harassment should be subjectively determined by the victim.” He said that of course some people do not believe that such a determination should be made, and whether or not there is sexual harassment must be determined whether the person in question agrees.
In Li Maosheng’s perception, whether or not sexual harassment constitutes should be determined by two standards. “One is a simple and pure objective standard, like touching private parts of the body. The law lists the chest, buttocks, and private parts. Of course, hugs and kisses are too. Second, frivolous words and touching other parts of the body are more problematic. If the average person thinks it will cause sexual discomfort, it is sexual harassment, and it will not change because of the victim’s special feelings. “
Li Maosheng said that if the behavior is objectively determined to constitute sexual harassment, the consent of the victim will serve as a deterrent and the tacit consent will become a point of contention. As for whether the victim considers sexual harassment, he thinks it should be just a trivial issue, just a trend, he was determined to protect the victim, that’s why he was distorted.
Regarding the Ji Pai Mei incident, Li Maosheng analyzed that the main control’s behavior objectively met the requirements of sexual harassment. The victim did not consent or gave implicit consent, only the intention of the perpetrator. “Industry rules and codes of conduct cannot rationalize the Of course, it remains to be confirmed whether the allegation of the girl with the chicken cutlet is true.”
After reading Li Maosheng’s opinion, some netizens believed that in the future contracts formalized between the agency and the artist, “there may be a special agreement that requires the artist to accept a certain degree of physical contact, and then they said yes you do not sign it, won’t you cooperate? ”Many netizens thought about related issues and laws, prompting heated discussions.
(Zhongshi News Network)
[ad_2]
