[ad_1]
Reporter Liu Yixuan / Taipei Report
Ding Yungong, a former spokesman for the Presidential Palace, was misled by the news and had sex with a reporter in the office, impacting all walks of life. Last year, two members of the Supervisory Board launched an investigation into this matter, the results of the investigation were released, and it was determined that Ding Yungong was indicted by 11 votes. Supervisory Commissioner Ji Huirong accused Ding Yungong of violating the proper conduct of public officials and insulting officials and was charged. However, Ding Yungong issued a 4 point statement earlier in response to this matter.
▲ The Yuan Supervisor approved Ding Yungong’s impeachment today by 11 votes unanimously. (Photo / Obtained from Tibet Anti-Riot Day-Taiwan Facebook)
Regarding the report on my impeachment by the Court of Control, I declare the following:
1. Regarding the sexual conduct in the bureau of the bureau, it is effectively inappropriate and violates the expectations of the public about public servants, so that in addition to having resigned from public office and assuming responsibility, he also again expressed apologies to the society. Regarding this part, I am willing to accept all kinds of provisions, including impeachment by the Supervisory Court, without dispute or complaint. The Executive Yuan Medal of Merit that was awarded to me for my performance in management will also be returned voluntarily.
2. The relevant part of the people who claimed that I had a relationship with the woman AND by virtue of power. The Oversight Committee’s investigation and the Oversight Committee’s response to the media have clearly indicated that I have been in a normal close relationship with the Y woman for two years and that there is no power relationship. I would also like to further emphasize that I have never relied on the power of my position to intimidate or induce a relationship during the development and progress of the relationship, and relevant speculation can be stopped.
3. However, the oversight committee criticized the incident by posting a photo on Facebook to inform others of the relationship between me and the female personal relationship, calling it “sexual harassment” and was deeply dissatisfied. The photo I posted is not a private or nude photo, but a neatly dressed photo taken in a public place (restaurant, not a box), to express sadness of the unstable emotional situation at that time and nostalgia, and it is not harmful . And feminine privacy at all.
When I posted the photo, I not only had no marital status, but I also broke up and broke up with my ex-fiancée. The night before the photo was posted, he was still in a relationship with woman Y overnight. And the woman said that the affiliation of the relationship is still being considered. The relevant issues and evidence from the text message The knowledge of the oversight committee has been provided, but the oversight committee has not adopted. Legal opinions are obviously misunderstood. This behavior is also completely incompatible with “sexual harassment” defined by the “Law on Prevention of Sexual Harassment”. Abuse of this term is likely to infringe people’s right to reputation.
Based on the same standard, if, as the Oversight Committee said, “informing others about the facts of previous relationships” is an act of “sexual harassment”, then the Y woman also broke the news to the weekly. Isn’t this a more serious sexual harassment for me?
4. Furthermore, the relevant oversight committee charged that after I got married on April 5, I continued to “harass” woman Y, but in fact, during this period, even for a long time, most of the Y women took the initiative to commit to me. Tonglian, I am not entangled with the woman Y unilaterally. And woman Y emotionally extorted money from him for various reasons, such as seeing a doctor, being hospitalized, having no living expenses and not being able to help her new boyfriend.
Furthermore, in the following years, the Y woman also continued to express her desire to meet through text messages and communications, but I ignored it. It is also clear who is stalking. This part of the relevant information communication evidence is also provided to the Vigilance Committee. It is regrettable that the Supervisory Committee ignores the relevant information.
Above, the Oversight Committee’s accusation of “sexual harassment” is based on gender stereotypes and the conclusion is that it first shoots arrows and then draws its target. It is also unfair for the Y woman to voluntarily reach out and ask for money after the breakup, instead of her constant harassment I also deeply regret the disclosure. This part of the survey report not only failed to develop gender equality in Taiwan, it also caused the public to misinterpret gender equality as narrow “gender-only correctness”, and its negative impact is far-reaching. scope.
